Flyoung Left Handed 7 Strings Electric Guitar Stringed Instruments Burl Maple Veneer Guitar

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

So in the example, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit. But in the structured requirements, the user says Technical Parameters Table should have Application Scenario. This is conflicting.

Hmm, perhaps the user intended that the Technical Specifications table in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table, but with different columns. Since the example is part of the required format, perhaps the user made a mistake in the structured requirements, and the correct columns are Feature, Specification, Benefit. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables.

Alternatively, perhaps the user wants the Technical Parameters Table as per the structured requirements (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), and the example's Technical Specifications is a different table. But the example's Technical Specifications is part of the required output.

This is a bit ambiguous, but since the example is given, I'll follow the example's structure for the Technical Specifications table with Benefit, and perhaps the user made a mistake in the structured requirements. Alternatively, maybe the user intended that the Technical Parameters Table is the same as the example's Technical Specifications but with Application Scenario instead of Benefit.

Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables: one Technical Parameters with Application Scenario and another Technical Specifications with Benefit. But that's unclear.

Given the confusion, perhaps proceed with the example's structure since it's the most concrete. The user's example shows the Technical Specifications table with Benefit, so I'll use that. The structured requirements mention Application Scenario, but maybe that's part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph.

Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be the same as the example's Technical Specifications but with Application Scenario instead of Benefit. To resolve this, I'll proceed with the example's structure since it's the final format required.

Proceeding with that, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Now, moving to the Choose Your Model table. The parameters should be key attributes like neck stability, tone richness, playability, etc. The Base, Advanced, Pro models. For example:

Something like that. The Pro model should have the highest specs.

Managers Note needs three technical breakthroughs. Maybe the set neck, the humbucker pickups, and the finish. Then guide users based on their needs.

Also, ensure the "With X, you can Y" structure is used in the descriptions. For example, "With the burl maple veneer, you can achieve a visually striking instrument while maintaining tonal resonance."

Comparative hints like "30% more durable than standard neck joints" if applicable.

Now, putting it all together in markdown format as per the example. </think>