Supplier's note
...
Ah, so the user's instruction says the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. So there's a conflict here. The user might have made a mistake. Since the example is part of the required format, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have the three columns as in the example (Feature, Specification, Benefit). The instruction's mention of Application Scenario might be a mistake. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is separate from the Technical Specifications table. Wait, the user says "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text" and then lists the Technical Parameters Table as a structured requirement. Then in the format example, the Technical Specifications table is part of the output. Maybe the user intended that the Technical Specifications table is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. To resolve this, I'll follow the example's format for the Technical Specifications table (Feature, Specification, Benefit) since that's what the user provided in the example. The instruction's mention of Application Scenario might be an error. Alternatively, perhaps the user wants two tables, but that's unclear. Since the example is given, I'll proceed with the example's structure.
Now, moving forward. The Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Benefit. Let's list the features from the product attributes and vision details. Features include material (travertine marble), shape (round/oval), storage, top material (marble and laminate?), edge design (split rock edge), certifications (maybe CE, ASTM). The benefits would be like durability, aesthetic appeal, functional storage, etc.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like size, shape customization, top material options. So the hint could be "Adjustable size and shape parameters to meet bespoke interior design needs."
Scenario Solution: For example, the round shape is suitable for small spaces to optimize flow, or the storage compartment for clutter-free living.
Choose Your Model table: Three versions. Let's think of parameters like weight capacity, durability rating, storage options, material quality. Base model might have basic specs, Advanced adds more storage, Pro has premium materials and higher durability. Comparative hints like "20% lighter" or "30% more durable".
Managers Note: Three technical breakthroughs could be the natural stone's durability, the split rock edge design for uniqueness, and the integrated storage. Then guide users: Base for budget, Advanced for storage needs, Pro for luxury and durability.
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the example format.
</think>