Good Quality Automatic Machine High Speed XFP Super Hole Edm Portable Hole Drill Machine

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

So the user's example shows that the Technical Specifications table has Benefit, but the structured requirement says Technical Parameters Table should have Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user's instruction is more detailed in the structured requirements, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table (with Application Scenario) is part of the Technical Specifications section. Alternatively, maybe the user intended that the Technical Specifications table in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table, but with different columns. This is a bit ambiguous. To resolve, perhaps I should follow the example's format since it's the final output format given, even if there's a discrepancy. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is the one in the example. Since the user's final output format example has Technical Specifications with Benefit, I'll follow that, but the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. Hmm, this is a problem. Wait, perhaps the user made a mistake in the example. Let me check the user's exact instruction again.

The user says:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)

Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

Then in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be the one with Application Scenario, but in the example, they used Benefit. Since the user's example is the required output format, I should follow that, even if there's a discrepancy. Alternatively, maybe the user wants the Technical Specifications to include Application Scenario. To avoid confusion, perhaps I'll create the Technical Specifications table with the three columns as per the example (Feature, Specification, Benefit), and the Technical Parameters Table as per the structured requirements. But the example doesn't have a separate Technical Parameters Table. This is confusing. Alternatively, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications to have the three columns as per the structured requirements. Maybe I should proceed with the structured requirements, using Application Scenario instead of Benefit. Let me proceed with that, since the structured requirements are explicit.

Wait, but the example shows Benefit. Since the user provided the example format, perhaps they expect the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit. Maybe the user made a mistake in the structured requirements. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is a separate table. Let me re-examine the user's instructions:

The user says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table is a separate requirement. The example format includes a Technical Specifications table, which might be different. To comply with the structured requirements, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is in addition to the Technical Specifications. But the example doesn't show that. Since the user's final output format example includes Technical Specifications with Benefit, perhaps the user intended that as the main table, and the Technical Parameters Table is part of that. Alternatively, maybe the user wants the Technical Specifications to have the three columns as per the structured requirements. Since the user's example shows Benefit, but the structured requirements say Application Scenario, I'm confused. To resolve, perhaps I'll proceed with the example's format, using Benefit, but also include Application Scenario in another part. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to have the three columns as per the structured requirements. Since the user's instruction says "Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)", perhaps that's the required table. Therefore, I'll create that table under Technical Specifications, using the columns specified.

Alright, proceeding with that. Let's outline the Technical Parameters Table:

Wait, but the product attributes mention "cnc or not:cnc", so CNC is a feature. The warranty is 1 year. The application scenarios from the image include manufacturing, repair, R&D. So that's covered.

Next, the Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like power supply, feed adjustment, impulse width. So the hint could be "Adjustable power supply and impulse width settings allow customization for varying material thickness and precision requirements."

Scenario Solution Paragraph: "The machine's medium drilling speed is ideal for balancing efficiency and precision in prototyping, while high-speed settings excel in mass production scenarios requiring rapid turnaround."

Choose Your Model Table: Need three models (Base, Advanced, Pro) with parameters like drilling speed, precision, portability, power. Let's say:

Managers Note: First paragraph highlights three breakthroughs: CNC precision, automatic operation, portability. Second paragraph guides selection based on user needs. For example, Pro is for aerospace needing high precision, Advanced for medium needs, Base for general use.

Now, putting it all into the markdown format as per the example. Also, ensure the "With X, you can Y" structure. For instance, "With CNC precision, you can achieve micron-level accuracy in complex geometries."

Check for comparative hints like "20% faster than traditional models" – since the Pro is 30% faster than Base, maybe compare to industry benchmarks. The example mentions "triple the industry standard", so perhaps the Pro's precision is better than industry average.

I think that covers all sections. Now, time to write it out in the required markdown format. </think>