Supplier's note
...
So the example shows Technical Specifications with Benefit. The instruction says "Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)". This is conflicting. Since the user provided the example format, perhaps they intended the Technical Specifications to have Benefit, and the Technical Parameters Table is a different table. But the user's instruction says "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text: Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements: Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)".
Hmm, perhaps the user wants two tables: one Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, and another Technical Specifications with Benefit. But that's unclear. To resolve, perhaps proceed with the example's structure since that's the format they want the output in. The example's Technical Specifications has Benefit, so I'll follow that. The instruction's mention of Technical Parameters Table might be part of the structured requirements but the example shows a different table. Since the user's final output format example is the key, I'll follow that. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Alright, moving forward. Let me outline each section:
Product Details: A brief intro about the product, mentioning material (aluminum), durability, coatings, and application in textile machinery.
Technical Specifications Table: Features like Material, Size, Coating, Application. Specifications from the image (aluminum alloy, rectangular/tapered, blue polymer coating, etc.), and benefits like durability, grip, etc.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like length, coating color, etc., to meet specific needs.
Get Inspiration: A paragraph inspiring customers, maybe about reliability and efficiency in textile operations.
Choose Your Model: Three models (Base, Advanced, Pro) with parameters like Material Durability, Precision Tolerance, Coating Resistance. Base has standard, Advanced +15%, Pro +30%. Compare against industry benchmarks.
Managers Note: First paragraph highlights breakthroughs in material, precision, coating. Second guides users to choose based on their needs (e.g., Pro for harsh environments).
Now, ensuring "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With chemical-resistant coatings, you can operate in harsh environments without degradation."
Also, include comparative hints where possible, like "30% stronger than industry standards."
Need to make sure all product attributes are included. The warranty is 3 months, so maybe mention that in the Product Details or Technical Specifications.
Wait, the product attributes are type:part and warranty:3 months. The image details add material, size, coating. So in the Technical Specifications, maybe include warranty as a feature? Or under Product Details.
The Product Details section can mention the 3-month warranty. The Technical Specifications focus on product features.
Putting it all together now.
</think>