Heavy Duty Tyre Protection Chain for Loader/Earthmover/Dump Truck/Grader/Crane

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so the user's example shows a Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit, but the structured requirement says Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). This is conflicting. Since the user provided both, perhaps the Technical Specifications in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table, but the columns are conflicting. Since the user's instruction explicitly states the columns for the Technical Parameters Table, I should follow that. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, and Application Scenario. To resolve this, perhaps I should create the Technical Parameters Table as per the instruction's columns (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), and the example's Technical Specifications might be a different table. But the user's example includes both. Hmm, this is a bit confusing. Since the user's instruction says "Structured Requirements" with the Technical Parameters Table having those three columns, I'll proceed with that.

Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake and the example's Technical Specifications is the correct one. Since the example is more concrete, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, Benefit. Let me proceed with that since the example is clearer. The user might have mixed up the terms. Let me check the example again. The example's Technical Specifications has Benefit as a column, which makes sense for a technical spec table. The structured requirement's mention of Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph. Maybe I should follow the example's structure for the Technical Specifications table. Let me proceed with that, as the example is more specific.

Alright, moving forward. The Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The features from the product attributes and vision details: material, finish, certification, length, spike design, durability, etc.

Now, the Choose Your Model table. The user provided an example structure with parameters like Tensile Strength, Spike Density, etc. The three models (Base, Advanced, Pro) need to be compared. The materials given are alloy, 25mnv steel, steel. The certifications are fixed, so maybe they are common across all models. The finishes can vary. The length is standard, so maybe that's the same. The spike density could be a parameter. The material could be the differentiator between models. For example:

Base Model: Alloy material, standard spike density, painted finish.

Advanced: 25mnv steel, higher spike density, galvanized.

Pro: Steel (maybe higher grade?), even higher density, black finish with enhanced corrosion resistance.

The certifications would be the same across all models since they are product attributes.

In the Managers Note, the three technical breakthroughs could be the materials (25mnv steel for strength), the spike design for traction, and the finishes for corrosion resistance. The user selection guide would be based on the application crowd: Base for general use, Advanced for moderate conditions, Pro for extreme environments.

Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the example format. Need to ensure the "With X, you can Y" structure in the descriptions. Also include comparative hints where possible, like "30% stronger than industry standards".

Let me draft each section step by step. </think>