Hempcrete Block Making Machine Block Making Machine for Construction

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's format example shows Technical Specifications with columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the structured requirements above, they mention Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). There's a conflict here. Which one to follow?

Looking back at the user's instruction:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

But then in the FORMAT section, they have Technical Specifications with Benefit instead of Application Scenario. The user might have conflicting instructions here. Since the user provided the format example with Benefit, perhaps that's the one to follow. Alternatively, maybe the structured requirements are part of the Technical Specifications. Need to check the exact instructions again.

The user's instruction says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table is supposed to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the FORMAT example, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit instead of Application Scenario. The user might have made a mistake here. Since the user's structured requirements specify the columns as Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, perhaps that's the correct one to follow. But the example in the format uses Benefit. Hmm, this is conflicting. Since the user provided the format example, maybe they want the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the user wants both? Wait, the user's instruction says "convert the following information into a table and descriptive text" with the Technical Parameters Table having those columns, but the format example shows a different structure. This is a bit confusing.

Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is the same as the Technical Specifications in the format. Let me check the user's instruction again. The user says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

Then the FORMAT section shows:

Technical Specifications

| Feature | Specification | Benefit |

So the user might have intended that the Technical Parameters Table (from structured requirements) is the same as the Technical Specifications in the format, but with columns Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format, it's Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the format example, perhaps they want to follow that, using Benefit. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake. Since the user's instruction says "Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)", perhaps that's the correct structure. But the example shows Benefit. To resolve this, perhaps I should follow the structured requirements, using Application Scenario instead of Benefit. But the user's example uses Benefit. Hmm.

Alternatively, maybe the user wants the Technical Specifications table to have three columns as per the structured requirements (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), but in the example, they used Benefit. Maybe the user intended the columns as per the structured requirements. Since the user's instruction says "Structured Requirements" first, perhaps that's the priority. So I'll proceed with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario for the Technical Specifications table.

Wait, but the user's example in the format shows "Benefit". Let me check the exact wording again. The user's instruction says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table must have those three columns. The example in the format may have been a mistake. Therefore, I should follow the structured requirements and use Feature, Specification, Application Scenario for the Technical Specifications table.

Proceeding with that:

Technical Specifications Table:

Feature | Specification | Application Scenario

For example:

• Block Type | Paver blocks | Construction projects requiring durable, eco-friendly building materials
• Raw Materials | Cement, sand, fly ash | Sustainable construction using recycled materials like fly ash
• Certification | CE Certified | Compliance with EU safety standards for industrial machinery
• Method | Hydraulic Pressure | High-pressure molding for dense, uniform blocks
• Processing | Brick Production Line Integration | Part of a larger automated production system
• Warranty | 1 Year | Peace of mind for initial operation and troubleshooting

Then, the Customization Guide: "Adjustable mold sizes and pressure settings to meet custom block dimensions or material mix requirements."

Scenario Solution Paragraph: "The machine's hydraulic pressure method ensures high-density blocks ideal for load-bearing walls. Its compatibility with fly ash supports sustainable construction by repurposing industrial byproducts."

Choose Your Model table:

Parameters like Compression Force, Mold Size Capacity, Automation Level, Material Handling.

Base Model: Lower compression, smaller molds, semi-automated, manual material handling.

Advanced: Higher compression, medium molds, automated, semi-automated material handling.

Pro: Highest compression (30% over base), large molds, fully automated, automated material handling.

Manager's Note: Highlight hydraulic pressure, CE certification, modular design. Then guide users: Base for small-scale, Advanced for medium with automation, Pro for high-volume and complex projects.

Also, ensure "With X, you can Y" sentences. Like "With hydraulic pressure technology, you can produce high-strength blocks efficiently."

Comparative hints: "30% higher compression than industry benchmarks."

I need to structure all this into the markdown format as per the user's example. </think>