Supplier's note
...
So the user's example format uses Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the instruction says Technical Parameters Table should have Application Scenario. This is conflicting. To resolve, perhaps the user made a mistake, and the example is the correct structure. Since the user provided the example format, I should follow that. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The user's instruction might have a typo.
Proceeding with that.
Now, the Scenario Solution Paragraph is part of the structured requirements, but in the example format, it's not present. Wait, the user's instruction says:
"Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)"
But in the example format, there's no such section. The example has "Get Inspiration" which is a short intro. Maybe the Scenario Solution is part of the Get Inspiration section? Or perhaps it's a separate paragraph. The user's instruction might have conflicting parts. Since the example includes "Get Inspiration" as a section, perhaps that's where the scenario solution goes. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Scenario Solution as a separate paragraph. To be safe, include the scenario solution in the Get Inspiration section as a short paragraph explaining application scenarios.
Now, moving to the Choose Your Model table. The key attributes need to be selected. Let's pick corrosion resistance, speed rating, load capacity, and material.
Base Model: Maybe uses plastic for lower cost, standard stainless steel (304?), lower speed, basic load.
Advanced: Stainless 304, higher corrosion, higher speed, increased load.
Pro: Stainless 316, highest corrosion, top speed, max load.
In the table, parameters like Corrosion Resistance Rating, Max Speed (rpm), Load Capacity (N).
For example:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
Corrosion Resistance | 304 Stainless | 316 Stainless | 316L Stainless |
Max Speed (rpm) | 3000 | 3500 (+16.6%) | 4000 (+33%) |
Load Capacity (N) | 1500 | 2000 (+33%) | 2500 (+66%) |
Wait, but the product attributes mention material includes bearing steel, plastic, stainless steel. So the Base could be plastic, Advanced stainless 304, Pro 316.
So:
Corrosion Resistance: Base (plastic, lower), Advanced (304), Pro (316). But how to quantify? Maybe using ratings like "Standard", "Enhanced", "Premium". Or use the material names.
Alternatively, use the material as a parameter.
Alternatively, the corrosion resistance could be a specification with values like "Resistant to mild environments", "Resistant to corrosive fluids", "Marine-grade corrosion resistance".
Speed could be in RPM. Load capacity in N.
The user's example shows "+15%", so using percentages compared to baseline.
Now, the Managers Note needs two paragraphs. First, three technical breakthroughs. Let's pick corrosion resistance (material), precision (P5-P2), and deep groove structure for high speed.
Second paragraph guides users based on applicable crowd. For example, Base for basic machinery, Advanced for corrosive environments, Pro for high-speed and heavy-duty.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like size (12x32mm can be customized), material grade (304 vs 316), and ball bearing type (deep groove vs angular contact).
Putting it all together in the specified markdown format. Need to ensure all sections are covered and follow the structure. Also, use "With X, you can Y" in the Managers Note.
Check if all product attributes are included. The input has cage:steel, cage material:metal, which is redundant. So cage is steel. That's a feature. Also, number of row:single row. So in the Technical Specifications, include Cage Material: Steel, which allows for durability.
Precision rating: P5, P6, etc. So the precision can be listed as "P0, P5, P6, P4, P2" with benefit of high accuracy.
Sealing type: seal, which prevents contaminants.
Structure: deep groove, allowing high-speed rotation.
Thickness: 12mm, 32mm (maybe OD is 32mm, so thickness is 10mm? Wait the title says 123210mm. So dimensions are 12mm (thickness?), 32mm OD, 10mm bore? Need to clarify. The title says "High Performance Deep groove Ball Bearing 6201 123210mm". Typically, ball bearing dimensions are bore diameter (d), outer diameter (D), and width (B). So 6201 is a standard bearing with bore 12mm (d), outer diameter 32mm (D), and width 10mm (B). So the dimensions are d=12, D=32, B=10. So in the Technical Specifications, the dimensions should be listed as bore 12mm, OD 32mm, width 10mm.
The product attributes mention "thickness:12mm,32mm" which might be a mistake. Probably the bore is 12mm, OD 32mm, and width 10mm. So in the table, include those dimensions with their specs.
Alright, time to structure all this into the markdown format as per the example.
</think>