High-Precision Ultraviolet Exposure Machine for Resin and Polymer Platemaking with Customizable Settings

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, there's a conflict here. The user first says the Technical Parameters Table should have Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, they have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The user might have made a mistake here. Since the example uses Benefit, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe they want two separate tables? Let me check the instruction again.

Looking at the user's instruction:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the user explicitly states that the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format, they have Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user's example format is part of the required output, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Maybe it's a mistake in the instruction. Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is separate from the Technical Specifications table in the example.

Wait, the user says "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text: Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)" So maybe the Technical Parameters Table is the one with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, and the Technical Specifications table in the example is another one. But the user's final format includes a Technical Specifications section with Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the user made an error, but since the example format is given, I should follow that. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables? Hmm, this is a bit confusing. To resolve this, perhaps the Technical Specifications table in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table mentioned earlier, but with Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Since the example format is more specific, I'll follow that, using Feature, Specification, Benefit. The user might have mixed up the terms, so I'll proceed with the example's structure.

Now, moving on. The product is a UV exposure machine for resin and polymer platemaking. The Technical Specifications table needs to list features like Material (stainless steel), Control System (digital with display), Voltage (220V), Automatic Grade (semi-automatic/automatic), Drawer Storage (2 stainless steel drawers), etc. The benefits would be durability, precise control, compatibility with voltage, flexibility in automation, storage for tools, etc.

Customization Guide should mention adjustable UV intensity and exposure time via the control panel, and the ability to choose between semi-automatic and automatic modes based on workflow needs.

Get Inspiration: Highlight precision, customization, and durability for commercial use in print shops or labs.

Choose Your Model table: Parameters like UV Intensity, Automation Level, Drawer Capacity. Base model might have standard intensity, semi-automatic, basic drawers. Advanced adds 15% intensity, full automation, enhanced drawers. Pro has 30% higher intensity, full automation, premium drawers. Comparative hints like "30% higher UV intensity than industry standards".

Managers Note: Three breakthroughs could be the UV intensity improvement, the automation options, and the hygienic stainless steel design. Then guide users: Base for small shops needing basic functions, Advanced for medium with automation, Pro for high-volume with premium features.

I need to ensure all product attributes are included, like voltage and automation. Also, the vision details like non-slip handles, color scheme, portability via handles. Maybe include those in the Technical Specifications as features like "Handles" with non-slip material and benefit of easy transport.

Wait, the vision details mention handles made of non-slip material (rubber/plastic), so that's a feature. Also, the color scheme with orange accents for visibility. Maybe include those as features with their benefits.

Putting it all together, the Technical Specifications table would have entries like:

Then the Customization Guide can mention adjusting UV settings and automation levels. The Get Inspiration paragraph can talk about precision and customization for resin work.

Choose Your Model table parameters might be UV Intensity, Automation Level, and Storage Capacity. The base model has standard intensity, semi-automatic, basic drawers. Advanced has +15% intensity, full auto, enhanced. Pro has +30%, full auto, premium.

Managers Note: Breakthroughs are UV intensity (30% higher than industry), automation options, and hygienic design. Then guide users to choose based on their needs: Base for small businesses, Advanced for medium with automation, Pro for high-volume with premium features.

I need to ensure the "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With adjustable UV intensity settings, you can optimize curing for different resin types."

Also, include comparative hints like "30% higher UV intensity than industry standards" in the Pro model's description.

Double-check all product attributes and vision details are covered. Voltage is included. Automatic grade is there. The handles and drawers are part of the features. The application scenarios would be in the Technical Parameters table's benefit column, perhaps, since the user's instruction for Technical Parameters Table includes Application Scenario, but the example uses Benefit. Since the example's format is given, I'll stick with Benefit.

Alright, time to structure all this into the required markdown format. </think>