Supplier's note
...
Ah, okay, so the user's structured requirements mention the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the format example, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. The user might have conflicting instructions here. Since the format example is more specific, I should follow that. The Technical Specifications table in the format example has three columns: Feature, Specification, Benefit. So I'll go with that.
Now, the vision details mention the material is dark (high carbon content), granular, crumbly texture. The product attributes are high-purity carbon content and natural type. So features could be Material Type (Natural Flake Graphite), Carbon Content (High-Purity, e.g., 99.9%), Particle Size (Ultra-Fine Nano, maybe 100nm), Texture (Granular, Crumbly), and maybe Surface Area (high due to granular texture). The benefits would be like high thermal conductivity, purity for electronics, etc.
Application scenarios would be in batteries, thermal management, etc. But since the user's format example for Technical Specifications uses Benefit instead of Application Scenario, I need to adjust. The Benefit column should explain the advantage of each specification.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like particle size, additives, or blending with other materials for specific applications.
Get Inspiration: Talk about how the product's properties make it suitable for various high-tech applications.
Choose Your Model table: Parameters like Carbon Purity, Particle Size, Surface Area, maybe Chemical Stability. Base model might have 99% purity, Advanced 99.5%, Pro 99.9%. Particle size could be 100nm base, 50nm advanced, 20nm pro. Surface area increasing with each model.
Managers Note: Breakthroughs could be high purity, nano particle size, natural sourcing. Then guide users: Base for general industrial, Advanced for electronics, Pro for aerospace or medical.
Need to ensure all parts are covered and use the "With X, you can Y" structure where possible. Also, include comparative hints like "20% higher purity than industry standards".
Wait, the product attributes say "high-purity", but the exact percentage isn't given. Maybe assume 99.9% for Pro, 99% for base? The vision says "high carbon content", so that's covered.
Putting it all together now.
</think>