High Quality 4WRPH6-C4 4WRPH6-C5 4Wrpeh Series Rexroth Proportional Servo Hydraulic Directional Control Various Valves

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so the user's format requires a Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the structured requirements mention a Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. There's a conflict here. The user might have made a mistake, but I need to follow the format they specified in the FORMAT section. The example given in the format uses Benefit, so I'll go with that.

Wait, the user says "Structured Requirements" include the Technical Parameters Table with those columns, but the format example shows a different table. Maybe the user wants both? Or perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is part of the Technical Specifications section. This is a bit confusing. To resolve, perhaps the Technical Specifications in the markdown should follow the user's format example (Feature, Specification, Benefit), while the structured requirement's Technical Parameters Table is part of that. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to be the Technical Parameters Table. Hmm. Let me check the user's instruction again.

The user's instruction says: "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text: Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements: Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)...". So the Technical Parameters Table is a required table with those columns, and the output format includes a Technical Specifications section. Therefore, perhaps the Technical Specifications section in the output is the Technical Parameters Table. So I'll structure the Technical Specifications as per the user's format example but with the columns they specified in structured requirements. Wait, no, the user's format example shows the Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the structured requirement says Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Maybe the user made a mistake. To resolve, perhaps the Technical Specifications table in the output should follow the structured requirement's columns (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). Let me proceed with that, since the structured requirements are explicit.

Wait, the user's format example shows:

Technical Specifications

| Feature | Specification | Benefit |

But the structured requirement says Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). So there's a discrepancy. Since the user provided an example format, perhaps they want the Technical Specifications to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be part of the Technical Specifications. This is a bit confusing. To resolve, perhaps I'll follow the structured requirements for the Technical Parameters Table, and the example format's Technical Specifications might be an additional table. But since the user's instruction says "convert the following information into a table and descriptive text" with the Technical Parameters Table, perhaps that's the main table. I'll proceed with the Technical Specifications table as per the structured requirements (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), even though the example shows Benefit. Alternatively, maybe the user wants both. Hmm, perhaps I need to clarify, but since I can't, I'll proceed with the structured requirements.

Wait, the user's example in the format shows the Technical Specifications with Benefit. Let me check the user's exact instruction again. The user says:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table is a separate table with those three columns. The user's format example shows a Technical Specifications section with Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is part of the Technical Specifications section. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables. Since the user's format example includes a Technical Specifications section, perhaps that's the main one, and the Technical Parameters Table is part of it. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake and the Technical Specifications should have Application Scenario instead of Benefit. Since the user provided an example format, perhaps they expect the Technical Specifications to follow that, with Benefit. To avoid confusion, I'll proceed with the example's format, but ensure that the required columns are addressed. Let me proceed step by step.

First, the Product Details section: a brief intro. Mention the Rexroth series, CE certification, iron material, 315 bar pressure, and the variety of valves (directional control, pressure relief, solenoid) from the image.

Technical Specifications table (as per the example format: Feature, Specification, Benefit). Features would be Material (Iron), Maximum Pressure (315 bar), Certification (CE), Type (Hydraulic Valve). Benefits: durability, high pressure tolerance, safety compliance, precise control. Also, maybe include the application scenarios here as benefits? Not sure. Alternatively, the Scenario Solution paragraph will handle application scenarios.

Customization Guide: The user wants a hint like "Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs". Since the product attributes mention maximum pressure, maybe adjustable pressure settings? Or material? The material is iron, but maybe customization in material options? The vision details mention some are black (maybe different materials?), so perhaps customizable material options (steel, aluminum) for different environments.

Get Inspiration: A short paragraph encouraging customers to choose based on their needs, maybe mentioning versatility across industries.

Choose Your Model table: The user wants three versions (Base, Advanced, Pro) compared against industry benchmarks. The example uses parameters like Key Attribute 1 with baseline, +15%, +30%. Since the product has a max pressure of 315 bar, maybe the base model is 315, advanced 360 (15% higher?), Pro 407 (30% higher). Also, maybe other attributes like response time, durability, certifications. Since the product has CE, maybe advanced has ISO, Pro has both. Or other features like temperature range, flow rate, etc.

Managers Note: Two paragraphs. First, three technical breakthroughs using features. For example, CE certification ensures safety, iron material for durability, high pressure tolerance. Second, guide users to choose based on applicable crowd: Base for standard applications, Advanced for heavy-duty, Pro for extreme conditions.

Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the format.

Wait, the vision details mention that some valves are pressure relief, directional control, solenoid. So in the Technical Specifications, maybe include those types as features? Or in the application scenarios.

Also, the material in product attributes is iron, but vision details mention metal (steel or aluminum). Maybe there's a discrepancy. The product attributes say material:iron, so I'll stick with that unless customization allows other materials.

Now, proceeding to draft each section.

Product Details:

"High-Quality Rexroth 4WRPH6-C4/C5/4Wrpeh Series Proportional Servo Hydraulic Directional Control Valves are engineered for precision and reliability. Featuring CE certification, iron construction, and a maximum pressure rating of 315 bar, these valves ensure robust performance in demanding hydraulic systems. The series includes directional control, pressure relief, and solenoid valves, offering versatile solutions for industrial machinery, construction equipment, and manufacturing processes."

Technical Specifications Table:

Wait, but the user's structured requirement for Technical Parameters Table includes Application Scenario. Maybe adding that as a column here. Alternatively, the Scenario Solution paragraph will handle that. Hmm. The user's example format has Benefit, so I'll stick with that.

Customization Guide:

"Customization options include adjustable pressure settings and material finishes to meet specific operational requirements, such as enhanced corrosion resistance or specialized temperature tolerances."

Get Inspiration:

"Explore the versatility of Rexroth hydraulic valves for applications ranging from precision machinery to heavy industrial systems. Whether you need controlled fluid direction, pressure regulation, or rapid response in solenoid actuation, our valves deliver unmatched performance."

Choose Your Model Table:

Managers Note:

1. Three technical breakthroughs:

• CE certification ensures compliance with EU safety standards, enabling seamless integration into regulated environments.
• Iron construction provides superior durability and resistance to harsh industrial conditions.
• The Pro Model’s 407 bar pressure rating exceeds industry benchmarks, supporting extreme hydraulic applications.

2. Optimal version selection:

• Base Model: Ideal for standard industrial applications requiring reliable performance at 315 bar.
• Advanced Model: Suitable for heavy machinery needing faster response times (150 ms) and broader temperature tolerance (-30°C to 100°C).
• Pro Model: Designed for high-pressure systems (407 bar) and extreme environments, offering unmatched durability and certifications for critical operations."

Wait, the user's example for Managers Note includes using [Feature] attributes and [Applicable Crowd]. So in the second paragraph, guide based on applicable crowd data. The example given was about Pro version's chemical resistance. Here, the applicable crowd would be industries needing high pressure, etc.

Also, the sentence structure "With X, you can Y" needs to be used where possible. For example, "With the Pro Model's 407 bar pressure rating, you can operate in extreme hydraulic systems."

Comparative hints like "20% faster than traditional models" should be included where applicable. In the Choose Your Model table, the response time for Pro is 100 ms, which is 50% faster than Base (200 ms). So maybe note that.

Adjusting the table to include comparative hints:

In the Managers Note, using the structure:

"With the Pro Model's 407 bar pressure rating, you can handle extreme hydraulic systems beyond industry standards. The Advanced Model's 150 ms response time offers 25% faster operation than the Base Model, ideal for precision machinery. The Base Model's CE certification ensures compliance for standard industrial applications."

Also, in the Scenario Solution paragraph (which is part of the Get Inspiration or another section?), the user wants an example like "Medium thickness fabric is suitable for summer shirts". Here, maybe:

"High-pressure directional control valves are ideal for construction equipment, ensuring precise fluid flow in heavy-duty operations. The solenoid valves' rapid response time makes them perfect for automated systems requiring quick actuation."

Wait, the user's instruction says "Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)". Since the product cluster table isn't provided, I'll use the vision details. The valves include pressure relief and directional control. So:

"Scenario Solution: The pressure relief valves in this series are designed to prevent system overloads, making them essential for safeguarding hydraulic machinery in high-pressure environments. Directional control valves are ideal for applications requiring precise fluid direction changes, such as in automated manufacturing lines."

Hmm, perhaps integrating that into the Get Inspiration section or as a separate paragraph. The user's format example doesn't have a separate section for Scenario Solution, so maybe it's part of the Product Details or Get Inspiration. Alternatively, the user might have intended it as part of the Technical Specifications. Since the user's example format includes Get Inspiration, I'll add it there.

Finalizing the sections with all elements. </think>