Supplier's note
...
Wait, so in the FORMAT example, the Technical Specifications table has columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the Structured Requirements above, it says Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). There's a conflict here. Since the user provided the FORMAT example, which is more concrete, I should follow that. The user might have made a mistake in the initial instruction, but the example shows Benefit. Therefore, I'll proceed with the columns as in the example: Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution paragraph instead.
So, moving forward:
Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Customization Guide: Mention adjustable parameters like length and thread size.
Scenario Solution: A paragraph explaining application scenarios, like "With a 25mm lead, the SFU2525 is ideal for high-speed applications in CNC machines where rapid and precise linear motion is critical."
Choose Your Model table: Three models with parameters like Load Capacity, Speed, Precision, Corrosion Resistance. Compare them with industry benchmarks. For example, Base Model has standard load, Advanced +15%, Pro +30%. Similarly for speed.
Managers Note: First paragraph highlights three breakthroughs: material (chrome steel), surface finish, flange design. Second paragraph guides selection: Base for standard needs, Advanced for moderate loads, Pro for heavy-duty.
Also, ensure "With X, you can Y" structure and comparative hints like "20% faster than traditional models".
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the format.
</think>