Supplier's note
...
Wait, the user's instruction says the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the format example, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the format example, maybe they want the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. But the instruction says Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). Hmm, perhaps the user made a mistake. Since the example format shows Benefit, I'll follow that, assuming it's a typo. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is different from the Technical Specifications section. Wait, the user says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."
So the Technical Parameters Table is supposed to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format, the Technical Specifications section is a table with Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the user intended two different tables: one called Technical Parameters with those columns, and another called Technical Specifications with the other. But the example format shows Technical Specifications as the main table. This is confusing. To resolve, perhaps the Technical Specifications section in the format is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Maybe the user mixed up terms. Since the example format includes Technical Specifications with Benefit, I'll proceed with that structure, but note that the user's instruction might have a discrepancy. Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is part of the Technical Specifications section.
Alternatively, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications section to be the Technical Parameters Table with the three columns. Let me proceed with the example format given, which uses the Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit. Since the user provided that as the format example, I'll follow that, even if there's a slight inconsistency in the initial instruction.
Proceeding:
Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Now, compiling the features from the product attributes and vision details:
Features from Product Attributes:
- Application: fishing, relaxing
- Capacity: 1 person
- Certification: CE
- Hull Material: HDPE, LLDPE
- Length: 380cm
- Type: sport yacht, electric
Vision Details:
- Camouflage color (material: HDPE/LDPE)
- Adjustable seat
- Front storage compartment
- Blue paddle attached
- Motor mount on rear (durable plastic/composite)
- Safety handles
- Modular design (motor mount removable, storage customizable)
- Versatility (manual and motorized)
- Comfort and safety features (high-back seat, safety handles)
So, for the Technical Specifications table:
Feature | Specification | Benefit |
---|
Material | HDPE/LDPE | Durable, lightweight, UV-resistant |
Capacity | 1 Person | Optimized for solo use |
Certification | CE | Meets safety and quality standards |
Length | 380cm | Stable and maneuverable in varied waters |
Motor Mount | Integrated, removable | Compatible with electric/gas motors |
Seat Design | Adjustable, high-back | Enhanced comfort and support |
Storage | Front compartment | Secure storage for gear |
Safety Handles | Front and side | Easy transport and emergency grip |
Modular Design | Customizable components | Adaptable to user needs |
Application Scenario would be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph, perhaps.
Next, the Customization Guide: "Adjustable seat height and modular components allow customization for specific fishing or recreational needs."
Scenario Solution Paragraph: "The kayak's medium length (380cm) balances stability and agility, making it ideal for calm lakes and moderate rivers. The camouflage design enhances stealth during fishing in wooded areas, while the motor mount enables switching between manual paddling and motorized travel for longer trips."
Choose Your Model Table: Need to create three models (Base, Advanced, Pro) with parameters like Material Quality, Motor Compatibility, Storage Capacity, etc.
Parameters could be:
- Material Durability
- Motor Power Output
- Storage Capacity
- Seat Comfort
- Safety Features
Base Model: Standard HDPE, basic motor compatibility, standard storage, basic seat, basic safety.
Advanced: Reinforced HDPE, enhanced motor (15% more power), larger storage, ergonomic seat, additional safety handles.
Pro: LLDPE with UV protection, premium motor (+30% power), expanded storage, adjustable lumbar support, advanced safety features.
Comparing against industry benchmarks (maybe industry standard motor power is X, so Base is X, Advanced is +15%, Pro is +30%).
Managers Note:
Technical breakthroughs:
- HDPE/LDPE blend for durability and UV resistance.
- Removable motor mount for versatile propulsion options.
- Adjustable seating enhancing comfort for extended use.
User guidance: Pro model suits serious anglers needing power and durability; Advanced for regular users wanting comfort and safety; Base for casual users on budget.
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the format.
</think>