Supplier's note
...
Wait, so the user's instruction says the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, they have Feature, Specification, Benefit. That's conflicting. Since the user provided the format example with Benefit, maybe they want the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. But the initial instruction says Application Scenario. Hmm, perhaps the user made an error, but I should follow the example given in the format. The example shows Benefit, so I'll go with that.
Proceeding accordingly. The Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Now, for the Scenario Solution Paragraph, which is part of the structured requirements. The example given is "Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because..." So maybe under the Technical Specifications, each row's Application Scenario is part of the Benefit? Or perhaps the Scenario Solution is a separate paragraph. Wait, the user says "Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)" So that's a separate paragraph. But in the output format, there's no section for that. Wait, looking at the format example:
The user's format includes:
- Product Details (few sentences)
- Technical Specifications table
- Customization Guide
- Get Inspiration
- Choose Your Model table
- Managers Note
The Scenario Solution might be part of the Get Inspiration section? Or perhaps the user missed it. Alternatively, maybe the Scenario Solution is part of the Technical Specifications' Application Scenario. Since the user's instructions are a bit conflicting, I'll prioritize the example format provided. Since the example Technical Specifications table has Benefit, I'll include that, and the Scenario Solution might be part of the Get Inspiration or the Managers Note.
Alternatively, maybe the Scenario Solution is a separate section. But since the user's example format doesn't have it, perhaps it's integrated into the Technical Specifications' Benefit column. For example, the benefit could state the application scenario.
Moving forward, I'll structure the Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit, where the benefit includes the application scenario.
Now, the Choose Your Model table needs three versions. The product attributes mention "technics:printed,print,automated cutting,sublimation" so perhaps the key attributes are breathability, moisture-wicking, customization level, durability, etc.
Base Model might have standard specs, Advanced adds better moisture-wicking, Pro has premium features like full customization and enhanced durability.
In the Managers Note, the three technical breakthroughs could be sublimation printing, moisture-wicking fabric, and automated cutting for precision. The second paragraph guides users to choose based on their needs: Base for basic teams, Advanced for moderate customization, Pro for high-end teams needing durability and full customization.
Also, ensure the "With X, you can Y" structure is used in the Technical Specifications benefits. Like "With sublimation printing technology, you can achieve vibrant, fade-resistant designs that withstand repeated washing."
Comparative hints where possible, like "20% faster drying than traditional polyester fabrics" in the moisture-wicking benefit.
Customization Guide should mention adjustable parameters like fabric thickness or pattern placement for specific needs. Maybe suggest that adjusting the material's weave density can enhance breathability for hotter climates.
The Get Inspiration section should highlight the unique aspects: camouflage pattern, customization options, and performance benefits.
Double-check all product attributes are covered: application is football, features include comfortable, new, lightweight, quick dry, breathable, material is polyester, style is sets, customized, uniforms, techniques like sublimation.
I think that's all. Now structure it into the required markdown format.
</think>