Supplier's note
...
So the Technical Specifications table is Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Technical Parameters Table mentioned in the structured requirements might be part of that. The user also mentions a Scenario Solution Paragraph, which is part of the customization guide perhaps.
Wait, the user's instruction says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
..."
Hmm, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) is separate from the Technical Specifications table. But in the example format, there's only Technical Specifications with Benefit. Maybe the user wants to merge them. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake, and the Technical Specifications table should have Application Scenario instead of Benefit. But the example shows Benefit. Maybe the user wants both tables? But the example format doesn't show that. Since the user's example format includes Technical Specifications with Benefit, perhaps the Application Scenario is part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph.
Alternatively, the Technical Parameters Table (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) is part of the Technical Specifications section. Maybe the user wants the Technical Specifications table to include Application Scenario instead of Benefit. But the example shows Benefit. This is a bit confusing. To resolve, perhaps follow the example format given, since the user provided an example. The example shows Technical Specifications with Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the user wants that, and the other tables are additional. The Scenario Solution Paragraph is part of the Customization Guide.
Proceeding with that, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Now, for the product's features:
- Microcontroller: ATmega32U4
- Voltage: 5V
- Operating Frequency: 16MHz
- Certifications: CE, EPR Germany, EPR France (but only the Pro model might have all three)
- Material: FR4 PCB
- USB Connectivity: USB connector for programming and power
- Pin Headers: 2-row, adjustable for customization
- Compatibility: Arduino Leonardo compatible
- Application Scenarios: DIY projects, automation, prototyping, educational use, IoT devices.
Benefits would be things like compatibility with Arduino ecosystem, ease of programming via USB, durability from FR4, etc.
Customization Guide: Adjustable pin headers for specific connectors, expandable with sensors/actuators, modular design for repairs.
Scenario Solution: For example, the modular design allows adding sensors for environmental monitoring projects.
Choose Your Model Table: Since the product attributes include three certifications, perhaps the Pro includes all three, while Base has CE, Advanced adds one EPR. Other parameters could be I/O pins, operating temperature, memory, etc. Let's assume:
Base Model: CE certified, 20 I/O pins, standard FR4, 0-70°C
Advanced: CE + EPR Germany, 24 I/O, reinforced FR4, -20-85°C
Pro: All three certs, 32 I/O, premium FR4 with thermal protection, -40-85°C
Managers Note: Three breakthroughs could be the certifications (meeting EU standards), FR4 material for durability, and USB connectivity for ease of use. Then guide users: Beginners use Base, advanced projects with EPR compliance choose Advanced, Pro for industrial or extreme environments.
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the example format.
</think>