Supplier's note
...
Ah, here's the confusion. The user first says the Technical Parameters Table should have Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit instead of Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the example is part of the format they want, perhaps the user made a mistake in the initial instruction. Since the example is more concrete, I'll follow the example's structure, which uses Benefit as the third column. Alternatively, maybe they meant Application Scenario as the third column. Hmm. Need to resolve this.
Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have three columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example, they used Benefit. Since the user provided the format example, which is more specific, I'll follow that. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Wait, but the user's instruction says "Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)". So maybe the example is wrong. Alternatively, maybe they mixed up. To resolve, perhaps the user intended the table to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. Let me proceed with that, but note that the example shows Benefit. Since the user's instruction is explicit, I'll follow that.
Alternatively, maybe the user intended the example to have the columns as per the instruction. Let me check the example again:
In the example format, the Technical Specifications table has columns: Feature, Specification, Benefit. But according to the instruction, it should be Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided both, perhaps they made a mistake. To be safe, I'll follow the instruction's columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But I need to make sure that the Application Scenario is clear. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the third column to be the benefit, and the instruction had a typo. Since the example is part of the required format, I'll go with the example's structure.
Wait, the user's instruction says:
"Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
[Key Attribute 1] | [Baseline Value] | [+15%] | [+30%]* |
[Key Attribute 2] | [Base Spec] | [Enhanced] | [Premium] |
So the Choose Your Model table has columns Parameter, Base, Advanced, Pro. The Technical Specifications table in the example has three columns: Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the user intended that, despite the earlier mention of Application Scenario. Maybe the user made a mistake in the initial instruction. To avoid confusion, I'll follow the example's format for the Technical Specifications table, using Benefit as the third column.
Proceeding with that.
Now, the Technical Specifications table:
Feature | Specification | Benefit |
---|
Frame Material | Solid Wood (Light-Color Finish) | Durable and aesthetically pleasing, suitable for modern interiors |
Shelves | Plastic (Smooth, Non-Porous Surface) | Easy-to-clean surface ideal for storing shoes or baskets |
Adjustable Hooks | Repositionable Hooks | Customizable storage for varying item sizes |
Base Design | Wide Round Base | Enhanced stability to prevent tipping |
Convertible Design | Modular Tiers and Hooks | Adaptable to different storage needs (e.g., seasonal changes) |
Customization Guide: "Adjustable hook positions and modular tiers allow customization to meet specific storage needs, such as maximizing vertical space in small entryways."
Get Inspiration: "The Modern Designed Wooden Clothes Rack combines sleek aesthetics with practicality. Its convertible design and sturdy construction make it ideal for organizing coats, bags, and accessories in any home, while the plastic shelves add a touch of modernity and easy maintenance."
Choose Your Model table:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
Load Capacity (kg) | 20 | 23 (+15%) | 26 (+30%) |
Adjustable Hooks | 6 Fixed Hooks | 8 Adjustable | 10 Fully Adjustable* |
Material Finish | Standard Gloss | Matte Anti-Scratch | Premium UV-Protected |
Managers Note:
-
Three technical breakthroughs: Convertible design allows modular reconfiguration for space optimization, Enhanced stability through wide base design, Durable material combination (wood and plastic) for varied environments.
-
Selection Guide: Base Model for standard needs, Advanced for adjustable storage, Pro for heavy-duty use and premium finishes. Example: "The Pro version's UV-protected finish ensures longevity in sunlit areas, while its 26kg capacity handles heavy winter coats and multiple bags."
Also, ensure "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With the convertible design, you can reconfigure tiers to suit seasonal storage needs."
I need to check all sections are present and formatted correctly. Also, ensure that the product attributes are all included. The input had "accessories:shelves", "door material:solid wood", "feature:hanging,modern,convertible", "material:plastic,wooden". The vision details add more aspects like stability, adjustable hooks, etc.
Looks like everything is covered. Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the example format.
</think>