All categories
Featured selections
Trade Assurance
Buyer Central
Help Center
Get the app
Become a supplier
... (few sentences)
| Feature | Specification | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| ....... |
(customization hints) ...
(a short introduction to inspire customers)
| Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| ... |
...
So in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit. But in the structured requirements, they said Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). There's a discrepancy here. Since the user provided both, perhaps the structured requirements are part of the task's instructions, but the format example shows Benefit. Since the user might have intended the example format as the required structure, I should follow the example's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit) even though the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two separate tables? Wait, no. The user's instruction says "convert the following information into a table and descriptive text" with the structured requirements. But the example format shows a different structure. This is confusing. To resolve, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table as per the example (with Benefit), and the Technical Parameters Table as per structured requirements (with Application Scenario). But the example's Technical Specifications section is the one to use. Since the user's example format is the required output, I'll follow that. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution paragraph instead.
Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications to have the three columns as per the structured requirements. But given the example, it's better to follow the example's structure. Let me proceed with the example's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit). The user might have made a mistake in the structured requirements, but the example is the key.
Proceeding with that:
Technical Specifications Table:
Customization Guide: Adjust staining dyes to highlight specific cell types, customize specimen types (e.g., leaf vs stem), or choose staining intensity for detailed analysis.
Get Inspiration: Inspire by mentioning how the slides help in teaching plant anatomy, comparing structures, etc.
Choose Your Model table: Parameters like Resolution, Specimen Detail, Durability. Base has standard, Advanced +15%, Pro +30%. Specimen Detail: Clear, Enhanced, Ultra-clear. Durability: Standard, Reinforced, Military-grade.
Managers Note: First paragraph highlights three breakthroughs (Pro's staining, Advanced's clarity, Base's eco). Second paragraph guides selection: schools to Base, researchers to Advanced, heavy use to Pro.
Also, ensure "With X, you can Y" sentences like "With enhanced clarity, you can identify organelles..." and comparative hints like "30% higher resolution than industry standards".
Check all sections are covered and formatted correctly in markdown. Make sure the tables are properly aligned. Avoid markdown in the thinking, but in the final answer, use markdown as specified. </think>
The Product Description is generated by third-party, and Alibaba.com is not liable for any risks related to inaccuracies or the infringement of third-party rights.
The information in this Product Description may differ from the details on the product listing page on Alibaba.com. Additionally, the contents may not be updated in real-time with the product listing page on Alibaba.com, and there may be delays in reflecting the most updated information. The description on product listing page takes precedence. You shall not rely on this Product Description in making transaction decisions.
The comparison data is based on manufacturer information and industry standards. Actual results may vary depending on individual use cases. It is advisable to verify details with the supplier for the most accurate information.