Supplier's note
...
Ah, so the user's example format for Technical Specifications uses Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Therefore, perhaps the user intended the example's structure, despite the earlier instruction. Since the example is the final format they want, I should follow the example's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit). The initial instruction might have a typo. So proceed with the example's structure.
Now, moving forward. Let's start drafting each section.
Product Details: A brief intro. Mention it's a commercial-grade extruder for corn-based snacks like kurkure and cheetos, made of stainless steel, steam-powered, certified, etc.
Technical Specifications Table:
Features: Material (steel/stainless steel), Heating Source (steam), Voltage (220V), Certification (2006/42/EC), Raw Material Compatibility (corn).
Specifications accordingly. Benefits would be durability, efficient heating, standard voltage compatibility, safety compliance, versatility for corn.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like heating intensity, extrusion speed, and die plate thickness to customize snack texture and shape.
Get Inspiration: Highlight the machine's ability to produce high volumes of puffed snacks, suitable for commercial use, with examples.
Choose Your Model Table: Parameters like Production Capacity, Energy Efficiency, Customization Level. Base: 150 kg/h, 15% more in Advanced, 30% in Pro. Energy Efficiency: Base is standard, Advanced 20% better, Pro 35%. Customization: Limited in Base, Moderate in Advanced, Full in Pro.
Managers Note: First paragraph on technical breakthroughs: steam heating for even cooking, stainless steel for durability, 220V for global use. Second paragraph guiding selection: Base for small businesses, Advanced for medium, Pro for large-scale with customization needs.
Need to ensure "With X, you can Y" structure in the Technical Specifications' benefits. For example, "With steam heating, you can ensure uniform cooking..." and comparative hints where possible, like "30% higher capacity than industry benchmarks".
Wait, the Pro model's capacity is 30% higher than Base, but the user wants comparison against industry benchmarks. Maybe set the Base as industry standard, so Advanced is +15% over industry, Pro +30%. Alternatively, if industry benchmark is the Base, then the table can show that. Need to clarify.
Alternatively, perhaps the Base model's parameter is the industry standard, so Advanced is +15% over that, Pro +30%. So the table would have the Base as the benchmark, and others as improvements over it.
Putting it all together now.
</think>