Supplier's note
...
Wait, the user's structured requirements mention the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format provided by the user, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. So there's a conflict here. The user might have made a mistake, but I need to follow the structured requirements first. Let me check again.
The user says:
"Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
..."
So according to the structured requirements, the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format given by the user, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit instead of Application Scenario. That's conflicting. Since the user provided both, perhaps they want the Technical Specifications table to follow the structured requirement's columns (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), but in their example, they used Benefit. Hmm, this is confusing.
Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have three columns as per the structured requirement, but in the example format, they might have made a mistake. Since the user's instruction says to follow the structured requirements, I'll proceed with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.
Therefore, adjusting the Technical Specifications table accordingly.
Let me rework that.
Technical Specifications Table Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.
So for each feature, list the specification and the application scenario.
Example:
Feature: Material Composition
Specification: Bamboo frame, cashmere-lined seat, rattan accents
Application Scenario: Ideal for eco-conscious parents seeking lightweight yet durable outdoor use.
Another example:
Feature: Adjustable Seat
Specification: Multi-position recline (full lie-flat to upright)
Application Scenario: Supports newborns in lie-flat position and toddlers in upright seating for playtime.
Proceeding with that structure.
Now, compiling all this into the markdown format as per the user's example.
Also, the Managers Note needs two paragraphs: one explaining three technical breakthroughs using features, and another guiding version selection based on applicable crowd.
For the three breakthroughs, maybe:
- Bamboo frame for lightweight and eco-friendly construction.
- All-wheel independent suspension for smooth rides.
- UPF 50+ canopy with ventilation for sun protection.
Then, the version selection: Base for budget-conscious parents needing basic features, Advanced for those wanting convenience (like one-hand fold), Pro for those needing maximum portability and advanced features.
Also, using "With X, you can Y" in the Technical Specifications' Application Scenario or in the Customization Guide.
The Get Inspiration section should be a short intro highlighting the product's main selling points.
Alright, putting it all together now.
</think>