Supplier's note
...
Ah, so the user's example format includes a Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the structured requirements mention a Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the example format is provided, perhaps the user expects the Technical Specifications table to follow the example's structure (Feature, Specification, Benefit), and the Technical Parameters Table is part of the structured requirements but not in the final output. Wait, the user says "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text: Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)" and then the structured requirements. But the final format example includes Technical Specifications with Benefit. Maybe the user wants the Technical Specifications table as per the example, and the Technical Parameters Table is part of the structured requirements but perhaps merged into that. Since the example's format is given, I should follow that, but also include the Application Scenario in some way. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake and the Technical Specifications in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. To resolve this, I'll proceed with the example's format for Technical Specifications (Feature, Specification, Benefit) and ensure that the Application Scenario is covered in the Scenario Solution Paragraph or elsewhere.
Now, moving forward. Let's outline each section step by step.
Product Details: A brief overview. Mention the ring's key features: vintage design, materials, certification, and suitability for occasions.
Technical Specifications Table: Features like Material, Setting Type, Certification, Main Stone, Style. Specifications from the input: 925 Sterling Silver & Gold, Claw & Pave Setting, RoHS, Diamond/Zircon, Vintage. Benefits: durability, elegance, safety, brilliance, timeless appeal.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like center stone size, metal type, band detailing. Hints for customization based on personal preferences or events.
Get Inspiration: A short paragraph inspiring customers, highlighting elegance and versatility for different occasions.
Choose Your Model Table: Three versions (Base, Advanced, Pro). Parameters could be Material Quality, Stone Type, Customization Level, Durability. Base uses 925 Silver and Zircon, Advanced adds Gold and Diamonds, Pro uses Platinum and Premium Diamonds. Compare against industry benchmarks with percentages.
Manager's Note: First paragraph highlights technical breakthroughs like RoHS, pavé setting, customization. Second guides users: Base for budget, Advanced for sparkle, Pro for premium.
Now, checking for "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With RoHS certification, you can ensure safety..." and comparative hints like "30% more durable than industry standards."
Need to ensure all product attributes are included: certification (RoHS), materials (925 silver, gold), main stones (diamond, zircon), setting types (claw, pave), style (vintage). Also, the image details like pavé band, vintage halo, durability from materials.
Potential issues: The product attributes mention "jewelry main material:925 silver,gold" which could mean the ring can be made in either, so customization allows choosing between them. The main stones are diamond and zircon, so the Pro version might have higher quality diamonds. The setting types are claw and pave, so the Pro could have a more intricate setting.
In the Choose Your Model table, parameters might include Material, Stone Type, Customization, and Durability. The Pro model could have Platinum instead of silver/gold, and premium diamonds. The Advanced could have gold and diamonds, while Base is silver and zircon.
Application Scenario in the Technical Parameters Table would be the occasions like weddings, engagements, etc., mentioned in the image description.
I think that's a solid plan. Now, structuring it into the required markdown format with all sections.
</think>