Supplier's note
...
Wait, the user's example format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the example format, I should follow that. The example format has Technical Specifications with columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the user intended that, even though the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. Maybe the structured requirements were a mistake, and the example is correct. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables: the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario and another table in the example. But the example's Technical Specifications table is part of the required format. To avoid confusion, I'll follow the example's format for the Technical Specifications table, using Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Scenario Solution Paragraph can then address the application scenarios as a separate paragraph.
Proceeding with that, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Scenario Solution is a separate paragraph.
Now, compiling the Technical Specifications:
Features from Product Attributes:
- Waterproof: Specification: "Waterproof formula", Benefit: "Long-lasting wear without smudging."
- Long-Lasting: Spec: "8-hour wear", Benefit: "Endures through sweat and humidity."
- Mineral-Based: Spec: "Natural mineral pigments", Benefit: "Hypoallergenic and gentle on sensitive eyes."
- 180 Colors: Spec: "180 shades (matte, shimmer, metallic, glitter)", Benefit: "Versatile for any look."
- Private Label: Spec: "Customizable branding and packaging", Benefit: "Tailored for individual or brand needs."
- Certification: Spec: "EU, UK, FDA, CPNP, EPR France compliance", Benefit: "Ensures safety and regulatory adherence."
Application Scenario in the Scenario Solution paragraph: "The palette's 180 shades are ideal for professional makeup artists creating dramatic runway looks, while the waterproof formula suits everyday wear in humid climates."
Customization Guide: "Adjustable color selection and packaging design to meet specific branding or niche market requirements."
Get Inspiration: "With 180 shades of matte, shimmer, and glitter, this palette empowers creativity. The waterproof formula ensures your look stays flawless all day."
Choose Your Model table:
Parameters could be Color Count, Waterproof Rating, Material Quality, Certification Level, etc.
Base Model: 120 colors, standard waterproof, basic mineral, EU/UK compliance.
Advanced: 150 colors, +25% waterproof, enhanced mineral, includes FDA/EPR.
Pro: 180 colors, +50% waterproof, premium mineral, full certifications.
Managers Note:
First paragraph: Highlight waterproofing, mineral formulation, color variety as breakthroughs.
Second paragraph: Guide users: Pro for professionals needing all colors and top performance, Advanced for frequent users, Base for occasional use.
Need to ensure "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With the waterproof formula, you can achieve all-day wear without touch-ups."
Comparative hints: Maybe "30% more colors than standard palettes" in Pro model.
I think that's the plan. Now structure it into the required markdown format.
</think>