RAF Multifunction 4 in 1 Grinder Food Processor Yam Pounder Ice Crush Maker Blender Juicers Three Cups Smoothie Blender

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, the user's final format example shows the Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the structured requirements, they mention Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. There's a conflict here. Since the user provided the final format example, perhaps they want the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Maybe the structured requirements were initial thoughts, but the format example takes precedence. To resolve this, I'll follow the format example's structure for the Technical Specifications table (Feature, Specification, Benefit), and the Choose Your Model table as specified.

Now, proceeding with that.

For the Technical Specifications table:

• Feature: Blade Configuration, Motor Type, Container Material, etc.
• Specification: 6 blades, 304 stainless steel; Pure Copper Motor; Stainless Steel.
• Benefit: Efficient blending, durable, etc.

Application Scenario would be in the Scenario Solution paragraph.

The Scenario Solution paragraph example is "Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...", so perhaps in the Get Inspiration section, but the user's format has a separate "Get Inspiration" section. Maybe the Scenario Solution is part of that. Alternatively, the user might have meant to include it in the Technical Specifications table. Since the user's final format example doesn't have that, perhaps the Scenario Solution is part of the Get Inspiration section.

The Customization Guide needs to mention adjustable parameters. The product has different attachments, so maybe the user can choose between them, or adjust the speed settings. The example says "Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs". Since the blender has a knob and digital control, perhaps adjustable speed settings for different tasks.

The Choose Your Model table needs three versions. Since the product is a single model (as per input), but the user wants to compare against industry benchmarks. Wait, the input doesn't mention different models, but the example requires creating three versions (Base, Advanced, Pro). Maybe the product is part of a series, and the user wants to compare it against competitors. Since the input's product attributes are for the RAF blender, perhaps the Base is the current model, and Advanced/Pro are hypothetical higher-end versions. Alternatively, the user might want to present different configurations of the same product.

Assuming that the user wants to create three versions (Base, Advanced, Pro) for comparison, even if the input only has one product. The key attributes could be power, capacity, motor quality, blade count, etc.

For example:

• Parameter: Power Output
• Base: 300W
• Advanced: 400W (+33%)
• Pro: 500W (+66%)

Capacity: Base 1.5L, Advanced 2L (+33%), Pro 2.5L (+66%)

Motor: Base standard motor, Advanced copper, Pro pure copper.

Blade count: Base 4 blades, Advanced 5, Pro 6 (as per input it has 6, so maybe Pro is the current model, but that complicates. Alternatively, maybe the input's product is the Pro model, and the others are lower. Need to think.)

Alternatively, the input's product is the Advanced model, with 6 blades, so Base could have 4, Advanced 6, Pro 8? But the input specifies 6 blades, so perhaps the Pro is the current, and the others are lower.

Alternatively, the user might want to present the RAF blender as the Pro model compared to industry standards. For example:

But the user's example uses "+15%", "+30%", so maybe relative to the Base. Let's structure it as:

Base Model: 300W, 1.5L (assuming the input's product is Pro with 500W and 1.5L?), but conflicting. Alternatively, perhaps the input's product is the Advanced model, and the Base is lower. Since the input's product has 6 blades and pure copper motor, maybe the Pro is the same as the input, and the Base is a lower version.

This is a bit confusing, but I'll proceed with the input's product as the Pro model, and create Base and Advanced versions with lower specs.

Manager's Note needs to highlight three technical breakthroughs. The input mentions pure copper motor, 6 blades, multifunctionality.

In the first paragraph, explain those three features.

Second paragraph guides users to choose based on their needs. For example, the Pro version's higher power and capacity suit heavy users, while the Base is for basic needs.

Now, putting it all together in the required format.

Check for "With X, you can Y" sentences. For example, "With a 6-blade system, you can achieve smooth textures in seconds."

Comparative hints like "30% faster than traditional models" if applicable. The input mentions ice crushing, so maybe "Efficient ice crushing capability, 20% faster than standard blenders."

Need to ensure all product attributes are covered.

Also, the product attributes include application:household, total crushing, ice crushing. So in the Technical Specifications, under application scenarios, maybe "Household use for blending, crushing ice, and more."

Wait, but in the Technical Specifications table, the columns are Feature, Specification, Benefit. So Application Scenario might be part of the Benefit column.

Alright, time to draft the sections step by step. </think>