Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger | High-pressure industrial processes | Liquid flow rate: 5000 L/h (Industry: 3000 L/h ▲66%) Stainless Steel 316L (ASTM A240) 120 tubes (Industry: 80 ▲50%) | Highest heat transfer efficiency, handles corrosive environments, customizable flow (ISO 9807) | Higher upfront cost, requires skilled maintenance, bulky design |
Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger | (Our Base Version) | Liquid flow rate: 4000 L/h (Industry: 3000 L/h ▲33%) Stainless Steel 316L (Industry: 304 ▲ corrosion resistance) 100 tubes (Industry: 80 ▲25%) | Cost-effective balance of performance and durability, compact compared to industry standards | Limited to moderate corrosion resistance vs. advanced version |
Tube in Tube Heat Exchanger | Limited-space HVAC systems | Liquid flow rate: 3000 L/h (Industry: 2000 L/h ▲50%) Stainless Steel 316L (Industry: carbon steel ▲ corrosion resistance) 0.7m length (Industry: 1m ▲30%) | Ultra-compact design, lightweight, ideal for confined spaces | Lower max pressure tolerance, less heat transfer capacity than shell-and-tube |
Tube in Tube Heat Exchanger | (Our Advanced Version) | Liquid flow rate: 3500 L/h (Base: 2500 L/h ▲40%) 316L with thermal coating (▲ durability) Integrated insulation (▲20% energy efficiency) | Enhanced flow and thermal efficiency, extended lifespan in harsh conditions | Higher cost, requires specialized installation expertise |
Tubular Heat Exchanger | Low-pressure food/pharma applications | Liquid flow rate: 2000 L/h (Industry: 1500 L/h ▲33%) Stainless Steel 304 (Industry: aluminum ▲ corrosion resistance) Lightweight (450kg vs. industry 500kg) | Cost-effective, lightweight, easy to clean | Limited to low-pressure use, lower heat transfer efficiency |
Tubular Heat Exchanger | (Our Base Version) | Liquid flow rate: 1800 L/h (Industry: 1500 L/h ▲20%) Stainless Steel 304 (Industry: carbon steel ▲ corrosion resistance) Quick-connect fittings (▲ ease of assembly) | Affordable, corrosion-resistant, modular design | Not suitable for high-temperature/pressure applications |