Silicone Breast Forms (Ours) | Daily wear, drag performances, mastectomy | Medical-grade silicone (ASTM F2981) ▲ Customizable sizes (B-G cup, 200-500 mL) Memory foam lining (▲ comfort over standard silicone) | Hypoallergenic, durable, realistic texture Lightweight (▲ 30% lighter than gel-filled) ISO 10993 biocompatibility | Higher cost than foam options Requires proper storage to avoid deformation |
Foam Breast Forms | Casual use, temporary needs | Lightweight foam (ISO 1856:2016) Limited size range (B-E cup) | Affordable, ultra-lightweight (▲ 40% lighter than silicone) Easy to fold | Less durable (▲ 2x shorter lifespan than silicone) Less realistic texture |
Water-Filled Breast Implants | Short-term medical use | Saline-filled (ISO 14155) Adjustable volume via valve | Natural weight distribution (▲ mimics natural breast density) Leak-resistant seals (▲ 99% leak-proof per ISO 13485) | Risk of leakage under pressure Heavier than silicone (▲ 50% more weight) |
Gel-Filled Breast Prosthetics | Post-surgery, high realism | Medical-grade gel (ASTM F2981) Thermal retention (▲ maintains body temp) | Most realistic texture (▲ 95% user satisfaction) ISO 13485 certified | Expensive (▲ 2x cost of silicone) Brittle at low temps (▲ requires storage guidelines) |
Custom-Made Breast Prosthetics | Personalized medical needs | 3D scanned fit (ISO 10360) Texture matching (▲ 98% skin tone accuracy) | Perfect anatomical fit (▲ reduces bra discomfort by 40%) Discreet seams | High cost (▲ 3x baseline) 2-week production delay |
3D Printed Breast Prosthetics | Innovative customization | Biocompatible resin (ISO 10993) Modular design (▲ interchangeable textures) | Lightweight (▲ 30% lighter than foam) Customizable shapes (▲ 10+ patterns) | Fragile under sharp force (▲ 50% lower tear resistance) New tech, limited durability data |