Category | Usage Scenarios | Characteristics | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|
Compactor System | Urban waste collection, high-volume areas | Industry Standard: 4:1 compaction (ISO 12345) | Our Base: 5:1▲ (reduces volume by 80%) | Our Advanced: 6:1▲▲ (90% reduction) (▲: 20% better than Base) |
| | | Base: Cost-effective for standard needs Advanced: Handles bulkier waste | Base: Limited to moderate loads Advanced: Higher upfront cost |
| Drive Configuration | Urban routes, mixed terrain | Industry Standard: 4x4▲▲ (better traction) | Our Base: 4x2 (fuel-efficient)
Our Advanced: 4x4▲ (improved traction) | |
| | | | Base: 15% lower fuel costs
Advanced: Navigates rough terrain easily | Base: Struggles on steep slopes
Advanced: 10% higher price |
| Emission Standards | Compliance-driven regions | Industry Standard: Euro 4▲▲ (strictest norms) | Our Base: Euro 2 (meets basic regulations)
Our Advanced: Euro 4▲ (complies with Euro 4) | |
| | | | Base: Lower initial cost
Advanced: Eco-friendly, tax incentives | Base: Higher emissions penalties in strict regions |
| Fuel Efficiency | Long-haul routes, cost-sensitive ops | Industry Standard: 10 km/L (diesel average) | Our Base: 10.5 km/L▲ (ISO 23509)
Our Advanced: 12 km/L▲▲ (15% better) | |
| | | | Base: Reliable performance
Advanced: Reduces fuel spend by $2,000/year | Advanced: Requires premium diesel |
| Transmission Type | Frequent stops (e.g., residential routes) | Industry Standard: Automatic▲▲ (user-friendly) | Our Base: Manual (cost-effective)
Our Advanced: Automatic▲ (smooth shifts) | |
| | | | Base: Lower maintenance costs
Advanced: Reduces driver fatigue | Base: Requires skill for city driving |
| Waste Handling Capacity | Recycling centers, mixed-waste sites | Industry Standard: 4 types▲ (e.g., hazardous) | Our Base: 3 types▲ (compactor, roll-off, recycled)
Our Advanced: 4 types▲▲ (adds hazardous) | |
| | | | Base: Meets 80% use cases
Advanced: Versatile for specialized tasks | Base: Limited to non-hazardous waste |