Smile Find Invisible Alignment Braces Clear Dental Consumables TPU PETG Material Teeth Aligners Sheets for Invisible Orthosis

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's example format shows the Technical Specifications table with columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the structured requirements above, they said Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). There's a contradiction here. Since the user provided the example format, perhaps they intended to follow that, even if the initial instruction had a different column. Maybe it's a mistake. To resolve this, I'll follow the example format's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit) because the example is more concrete. Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to have Application Scenario, but the example uses Benefit. Hmm.

Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake, and the example is correct. Let me check the user's instruction again:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the user explicitly states that the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But the example format shows Benefit. That's conflicting. Since the user's instruction is more specific, perhaps I should follow the columns as per the instruction, not the example. However, the example's format is part of the required output. Wait, the user says:

"### FORMAT