Supplier's note
...
Wait, so the user's structured requirements mention a Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the format example, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. So there's a conflict here. The user might have made a mistake, but I need to follow the format given in the example. Since the example shows the Technical Specifications table with Benefit, I'll go with that. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is separate from the Technical Specifications. Wait, the user's instruction says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
..."
So the user wants the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format, the Technical Specifications section has Feature, Specification, Benefit. Hmm, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications to be the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Maybe it's a mistake, but I should follow the structured requirements. Since the example shows the Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the structured requirement says Application Scenario, perhaps I need to check again.
Alternatively, maybe the Technical Specifications in the example is part of the overall structure, but the user's instruction says to create a Technical Parameters Table with those columns. Since the user's instruction is the main guide, I should follow the structured requirements. So the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.
Wait, the user's instruction says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
..."
Therefore, the Technical Parameters Table must have those three columns. The example format shows a Technical Specifications table with Benefit, but perhaps that's an example from another context. Since the user's instruction specifies the columns, I should follow that. So the Technical Specifications section should be the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.
Wait, but the user's example format shows the Technical Specifications with Benefit. Hmm, conflicting instructions. Since the user's structured requirements are more specific, I'll prioritize them. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.
Now, proceeding with that.
First, the Technical Specifications table:
Features would be Material, Application, maybe Tooth Design, etc. Specifications would be Stainless Steel, suitable for cats/dogs, etc. Application Scenario would be for removing tangles, flea control, etc.
Customization Guide: Maybe adjustable tooth spacing for different coat types.
Scenario Solution Paragraph: For example, the fine teeth are suitable for long-haired dogs to remove mats without discomfort.
Choose Your Model table: Parameters like Tooth Density, Material Thickness, Handle Design. Base model has standard, Advanced has 15% denser teeth, Pro has 30% denser. Or something like that.
Managers Note: Three breakthroughs could be stainless steel durability, eco-friendly coating, ergonomic handle. Then guide users: for regular grooming, Base is fine; for thick coats, Advanced; for professional use, Pro.
Also, need to include "With X, you can Y" sentences. Like "With stainless steel construction, you can ensure long-lasting durability against rust and corrosion."
Comparative hints: Maybe "20% lighter than traditional combs" if applicable, but the material is stainless steel, which might not be lighter. Alternatively, "30% more effective at removing fleas than standard combs."
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the example format.
Wait, the user's example format includes sections like Product Details, Technical Specifications, Customization Guide, Get Inspiration, Choose Your Model, Managers Note.
Starting with Product Details: A brief intro covering key points from the product attributes and image description.
Technical Specifications table with three columns as specified.
Customization Guide: The hint about adjustable parameters.
Get Inspiration: A paragraph highlighting the design and practicality.
Choose Your Model table with the three models and their specs.
Managers Note with two paragraphs as instructed.
Also, ensure the eco-friendly feature is addressed. Since the product attributes mention eco-friendly, perhaps the packaging is recyclable or the material is sustainable. The image mentions the design is eco-friendly? Or maybe the material is eco-friendly. The product attributes say feature:eco-friendly, so need to include that in the specs.
Wait, the product attributes list "feature:eco-friendly" so that's a key point. So in the Technical Specifications table, there should be a row for Eco-Friendly, specification could be "Recyclable packaging and non-toxic materials" or similar, application scenario being environmentally conscious pet owners.
Alright, let me structure this step by step.
</think>