Stone Design Enamel Watch Dial Markers Stainless Steel 31mm Luxury Single Calendar Wrist Watch Dial Face Blanks Fits for Nh35/36

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's instruction says the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. There's a discrepancy here. Let me recheck the instruction.

Looking again:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table must have the three columns as specified. But in the example format provided by the user, they have "Technical Specifications" with columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. The user might have made a mistake, but I need to follow the structured requirements first. Wait, perhaps the user intended that the Technical Specifications table in the format should follow the columns specified in the structured requirements. Let me proceed with the columns as per the structured requirements: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Therefore, in the Technical Specifications table, each row will have Feature (like Material), Specification (304 stainless steel, brass), and Application Scenario (e.g., "Suitable for high-end dive watches requiring corrosion resistance and durability").

Wait, but the example given in the instruction for the Technical Specifications table in the format has a "Benefit" column. Hmm, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, and Application Scenario as per the structured requirements, but in the example format, they used Benefit. This is confusing. To resolve this, perhaps the user intended that the Technical Specifications table should have the three columns as per the structured requirements (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). Therefore, I'll structure it that way.

Moving on, the Customization Guide needs to mention adjustable parameters. The vision detail says the dial is compatible with various cases and movements, so maybe the customization hint could be adjusting the gradient color or marker design for different styles.

The Get Inspiration section should be a short intro highlighting key features like the gradient design and diving certification.

For the Choose Your Model table, I need to compare three models (Base, Advanced, Pro) against industry benchmarks. The key attributes could be water resistance, material quality, customization options, etc. Since the product is a dial, maybe parameters like water resistance rating (though dials themselves don't have that, but the watch does), but perhaps the material durability, compatibility with movements, customization flexibility.

Wait, the product is a dial part. So the models might differ in features like material (e.g., Base uses 304 steel, Advanced uses a higher grade?), or maybe the Pro model has additional features like luminescent markers or different certifications.

Alternatively, since the product is a dial blank, the models could vary in size, material options, or customization possibilities. The user's input says the product is 31mm, but maybe different models have different sizes or materials.

Alternatively, the three models could be based on the movement compatibility (Nh35/36), but the title already mentions that. Hmm, perhaps the models are different versions of the dial with varying features. For example:

• Base Model: Standard 304 stainless steel, basic enamel markers, fits Nh35/36
• Advanced: Enhanced corrosion resistance, maybe a different finish, more customization options
• Pro: ISO 6425 certified (as per the vision detail's diving certification), higher water resistance compatibility, premium materials.

Wait, the vision detail mentions the dial has "660 ft - 200 m" certification, so that's part of the product's features. So perhaps the Pro model includes that certification, while Base and Advanced don't? Or maybe the certification is a feature of the Pro model.

Alternatively, the models could be categorized by application scenarios: Base for general use, Advanced for diving, Pro for extreme conditions.

I need to make sure the Choose Your Model table has three columns plus the parameter. Let me think of parameters like:

• Material Quality
• Water Resistance Certification
• Customization Flexibility
• Compatibility with Movements
• Marker Design Options

For example:

This way, each model offers incremental improvements.

The Managers Note needs two paragraphs. First, three technical breakthroughs. The diving certification (ISO 6425) is one. The enamel markers for readability. The material blend of stainless steel and brass for durability and aesthetics.

Second paragraph guides users: For divers needing 200m, choose Pro. Casual users can go with Base. Advanced for those needing more customization or 100m.

Also, use "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With ISO 6425 certification, you can dive confidently up to 200 meters."

Need to ensure all product attributes are covered. The product is a dial for watches, made of 304 stainless steel and brass, high-end style, fits Nh35/36 movements. The vision details add the blue gradient, diving certification, and compatibility.

Putting it all together now. </think>