Supplier's note
...
Ah, here's the confusion. The user's structured requirements mention a Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, they have a Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit. The user probably made a mistake in the structured requirements, and the example format is the correct one. Since the example format is provided as the required output structure, I should follow that. The Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The initial instruction's mention of Application Scenario might be a mistake. So I'll proceed with the example's columns.
Now, proceeding to build the tables.
Technical Specifications:
Features like Power Source (Petrol), Engine Type (4-stroke, 2.2kw), Backpack Design, Adjustable Nozzle, Material (durable plastic/composite), Ergonomic Handle.
Specifications would be the exact specs. Benefits would be the advantages, like "reliable power for heavy-duty tasks", "reduced emissions and noise compared to 2-stroke engines", etc.
Customization Guide: Adjustable nozzle direction and force, backpack straps for fit, power settings.
Get Inspiration paragraph: Encourage customers by highlighting the benefits, like efficiency, comfort, durability.
Choose Your Model Table: Since the product is the Base Model (2.2kw), but the user wants to compare with Advanced and Pro. Let's assume:
- Base Model: 2.2kw, standard features
- Advanced: 2.5kw, enhanced durability
- Pro: 3.0kw, premium materials, quieter operation
Parameters could be Engine Power, Durability, Noise Level, Weight, etc.
Managers Note: First paragraph on breakthroughs like 4-stroke engine efficiency, ergonomic design, adjustable nozzle. Second paragraph guiding users: Base for home use, Advanced for professionals, Pro for heavy-duty.
Need to ensure all points are covered and the structure matches the example.
</think>