Supplier's note
...
Wait, so the user's own example format shows the Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the structured requirements above, they mentioned Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). This is conflicting. Since the user provided the format example with Benefit instead of Application Scenario, I should follow the example's format because that's the explicit instruction. Maybe they made a mistake in the structured requirements. Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But the example shows Benefit. To resolve this, I'll follow the example's format given in the FORMAT section, which uses Benefit. Because the user's example is more specific.
So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Now, proceeding to build each section step by step.
Product Details: Start with a concise intro. Mention carbide material, coatings, high precision, suitable for CNC milling machines. Mention versatility in sizes and applications like metalworking industries.
Technical Specifications:
-
Feature: Material Composition
- Specification: Solid Carbide (Tungsten Cobalt)
- Benefit: Ensures exceptional hardness and heat resistance for long tool life.
-
Feature: Coatings (TiCN/AlTiN/TiN/TiAlN)
- Specification: Multiple coating options available
- Benefit: Enhances wear resistance and allows machining of tough materials like stainless steel and titanium.
-
Feature: Precision Grade
- Specification: High Precision (ISO P)
- Benefit: Achieves tight tolerances for intricate part manufacturing.
-
Feature: Flute Design
- Specification: Helical Flutes (2-4 flutes)
- Benefit: Reduces vibration and improves chip evacuation for smoother cuts.
-
Feature: Machine Compatibility
- Specification: CNC Milling Machines
- Benefit: Optimized for automated high-speed machining processes.
Customization Guide: Suggest adjustable parameters like flute count (adjust for chip removal needs), diameter (for varying cut depths), coating selection (based on material being machined).
Get Inspiration: Talk about how these cutters are essential for precision in industries like aerospace, automotive, etc. Mention customization options to meet specific needs.
Choose Your Model Table:
Parameters could be Cutting Speed, Tool Life, Surface Finish, Flute Count.
Base Model: Cutting Speed 50 m/min, Tool Life 30 min, Surface Finish Ra 2.0 μm, Flute Count 2.
Advanced: +15% speed (57.5), +20% tool life (36), -30% surface finish (1.4), Flute Count 3.
Pro: +30% speed (65), +40% tool life (42), -50% surface finish (1.0), Flute Count 4.
Expressed as percentages over base:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
Cutting Speed | 50 m/min | +15% | +30% |
Tool Life | 30 min | +20% | +40% |
Surface Finish | Ra 2.0 μm | -30% | -50% |
Flute Count | 2 | +50% | +100% |
Wait, but the example uses "+15%", so for surface finish, which is better when lower, maybe express it as "Improved by -30%" but the structure might prefer positive increments. Alternatively, maybe use "Surface Finish Improvement" as a parameter. Alternatively, rephrase to "Surface Finish Quality" where higher percentage means better. Not sure. Alternatively, just use the values as is, with the note that lower Ra is better. The user's example had "Surface Finish" with a value and improvement.
Managers Note:
First paragraph: Highlight three technical breakthroughs. For example, TiAlN coating for high temp resistance, helical flutes for reduced vibration, carbide material for durability.
Second paragraph: Guide selection. Base for general use, Advanced for medium demands, Pro for high precision and tough materials.
Also include comparative hints like "20% faster than traditional HSS tools".
Now, putting it all together in markdown format as per the example.
</think>