Supplier's note
...
So the FORMAT example uses Technical Specifications with Feature, Specification, Benefit. The structured requirements mentioned earlier (Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) might be part of the Technical Specifications section. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake. Since the example is more concrete, I'll follow the example's structure for the Technical Specifications table, using Benefit instead of Application Scenario. The Scenario Solution Paragraph can address the application scenarios.
Now, proceeding step by step.
First, the Technical Specifications table:
Features from the product attributes and vision details:
- Blade Material: Stainless Steel (from vision and attributes)
- Blade Configuration: Dual-blade system (vision)
- Handle Material: ABS Plastic (vision)
- Handle Design: Ergonomic (vision)
- Application: Face Shaving (product attribute)
- Packaging: Pack (product attribute)
Wait, but the user's input says "packing:pack" so that's part of the product attributes. Maybe include that as a feature? Or is packaging more of a specification under another feature?
Alternatively, the Technical Specifications should focus on the product's features, not packaging. Packaging might be part of the product details but not in the technical specs. Let's see.
The user's example in the thought process had a Technical Specifications table with features like Blade Material, etc. So I'll list the main features here.
So the Technical Specifications table would have:
Feature | Specification | Benefit |
---|
Blade Material | Stainless Steel | Ensures sharpness and corrosion resistance for long-lasting performance. |
Blade Configuration | Dual-blade System | Achieves a close, smooth shave with reduced irritation. |
Handle Material | ABS Plastic | Lightweight and durable, providing a comfortable grip. |
Handle Design | Ergonomic | Reduces slippage and improves control during use. |
Durability | Corrosion-resistant | Maintains sharpness over multiple uses, extending blade life. |
Packaging | Pack | Convenient storage and protection during transport. |
Wait, but the user's input says "application:face shaving" which is the application. Maybe that's part of the scenario solution paragraph instead.
Next, the Customization Guide. The vision details mention that blades can be used with various handles, so customization options could include handle material or color. The example given was about adjusting parameters for special needs. So perhaps:
Customization Guide:
Adjustable blade spacing to accommodate different skin sensitivities or hair thickness. Compatible with multiple handle types for personalized grip preferences.
Scenario Solution Paragraph:
The dual-blade system is ideal for face shaving, providing a close shave on areas with dense hair. The ergonomic handle ensures stability even when wet, making it suitable for both dry and wet shaving routines.
Choose Your Model table: Need to create three models (Base, Advanced, Pro). Let's think of parameters like Blade Count, Durability, Comfort, etc.
Assuming the Base model has standard features, Advanced adds more blades or better grip, Pro has premium materials or longer durability.
Example:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
Blade Count | 2 Blades | 3 Blades | 4 Blades |
Durability | Standard | +20% | +40% |
Grip Technology | Basic Ergonomic | Enhanced Grip | Premium Non-Slip |
Material Quality | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel + Coating | Surgical-grade Stainless Steel |
Price Tier | Budget | Mid-range | Premium |
Wait, but the user's example had percentages like [+15%]. Maybe better to use relative terms. Alternatively, use specifications like blade count numbers, and for durability, maybe "Standard", "Enhanced", "Premium".
Alternatively, using the example's structure where some have percentages:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
Blade Count | 2 Blades | 3 Blades | 4 Blades |
Blade Sharpness | Standard | +15% | +30% |
Handle Durability | ABS Plastic | Reinforced ABS | Titanium Alloy |
Water Resistance | IPX2 | IPX4 | IPX6 |
But I need to make sure the parameters are relevant. Since the product is a cartridge blade, blade count, sharpness, handle material, durability, etc.
Manager's Note:
First paragraph: Highlight three technical breakthroughs. The dual blades, ergonomic handle, and stainless steel material.
Second paragraph: Guide users. For example, the Pro model's titanium handle is best for frequent users needing extra durability. The Base model is good for budget-conscious users.
Now, putting it all together in the required format.
Also, using "With X, you can Y" structure in the product details and technical specs. For example, "With stainless steel blades, you can achieve a precise and long-lasting shave."
Comparative hints like "20% lighter than traditional razors" if applicable. The handle material is ABS, which is lightweight, so maybe "Lightweight ABS handle, 20% lighter than metal alternatives."
Wait, the vision details mention the handle is plastic (ABS) which is lightweight. So that's a good point.
Let me start drafting each section step by step.
</think>