Universal Motorcycle Fork Seal Driver Tool Kit 14pcs for Use on 35mm 36mm 40mm 41mm 42mm 43mm 45mm 46mm 47mm 48mm 49mm 50mm

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so the user's example format shows the Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. There's a contradiction here. Since the user provided an example format, perhaps they expect the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the structured requirements are separate from the example. The user might have made a mistake, but since the example is more concrete, I'll follow the example's structure for the Technical Specifications table (Feature, Specification, Benefit). The Technical Parameters Table in the structured requirements might be a different table, but since the example doesn't mention it, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications as per the example.

Alternatively, maybe the "Technical Parameters Table" is the same as the Technical Specifications section. The user's instruction says "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text: Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements: Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)". So perhaps the Technical Specifications section should have those three columns. But the example shows Benefit. Hmm, this is conflicting. Since the user's instruction explicitly states the columns for the Technical Parameters Table, I'll follow that. So the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Wait, but in the example format, the user shows the Technical Specifications with Benefit. Maybe the user made a mistake, but I need to follow their instructions. Let me proceed with the columns as per the structured requirements: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Now, moving on. For the Technical Specifications table:

Features could be:

• Material Composition: Plastic and Iron
• Compatibility: 35mm to 50mm fork seals
• Storage Design: Blue plastic case with grid pattern and red holders
• Safety Features: Secure holders and organized layout

Specifications would be the details of each feature. Application Scenario would be where it's used, like motorcycle maintenance, repair shops, etc.

Customization Guide: The user can adjust the included sizes or add more tools for specific needs.

Get Inspiration: A paragraph about how this tool kit helps mechanics and enthusiasts efficiently handle fork seal replacements.

Choose Your Model table: Three versions. Let's think of parameters like Compatibility Range, Material Quality, Storage Capacity, Tool Count.

Base Model might cover up to 45mm, Advanced up to 48mm, Pro up to 50mm. Material could be standard plastic vs. reinforced. Storage capacity: Base has fewer compartments, Pro more. Tool count: maybe Base has 12, Advanced 14, Pro 16. Or maybe the Pro includes additional tools.

Managers Note: Highlight the Pro's expanded range, better materials, and storage. Guide users: Base for common sizes, Advanced for mid-range, Pro for full range and durability.

Also, use "With X, you can Y" sentences. For example, "With the reinforced iron components, you can ensure durability during heavy-duty applications."

Comparative hints: "20% lighter than traditional kits" if applicable. Since the case is plastic, maybe lighter than metal cases.

Need to ensure all sections are covered and the tables are correctly formatted. Let me start drafting each part step by step. </think>