Supplier's note
...
So according to the example, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit. But the instruction says Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario).
This is conflicting. Maybe the user made a mistake in the example. Since the instruction is more explicit, perhaps I should follow the instruction's Technical Parameters Table structure (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), and the example's Technical Specifications is a different table. Alternatively, maybe the user wants the Technical Specifications to include Application Scenario instead of Benefit.
Alternatively, perhaps the user intended that the Technical Specifications table is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Maybe the example's Technical Specifications is the same as the required Technical Parameters Table. Let me assume that the user might have mixed up the terms. To resolve this, I'll follow the instruction's requirement for the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.
Wait, but in the example's format, the user has a Technical Specifications table with Benefit. So perhaps the user wants two tables? The instruction says "Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)" and then the example shows a Technical Specifications table with Benefit.
This is confusing. Maybe the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be part of the Technical Specifications section. Let me proceed by creating the Technical Parameters Table as per the instruction's columns (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), and include it under the Technical Specifications section.
Alternatively, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications to have Benefit, and the Technical Parameters Table is a separate table. But the user's instruction says "convert the following information into a table and descriptive text: Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements: Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)".
Therefore, the Technical Parameters Table should be created with those three columns. The example's Technical Specifications table might be a different part.
Alternatively, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications to be the Technical Parameters Table. Let me proceed with that.
So, for the Technical Parameters Table:
Feature | Specification | Application Scenario
Features could be things like Screen Size, Certifications, Brightness, etc.
Given the input attributes: certification:CQC,CE,FCC; screen size:customized.
So Features would be:
-
Screen Size: Customizable (Specification), Application Scenario: Retail displays requiring varied shelf space.
-
Certifications: CQC, CE, FCC (Specification), Application Scenario: International compliance in supermarkets and retail stores.
Maybe add brightness as a feature, inferred from typical LCD specs.
Then, the Customization Guide would mention adjustable screen sizes and angles.
The Scenario Solution paragraph would explain how the display's features suit different retail needs, like promotions or product showcases.
The Choose Your Model table needs three versions. Let's think of parameters like screen size, brightness, connectivity, power consumption.
Base Model: Maybe 15" screen, 400 nits brightness, basic connectivity (HDMI, USB).
Advanced: 18", 500 nits (+25% over base?), Wi-Fi + Ethernet.
Pro: 21", 600 nits (+33% from base?), 4K resolution, advanced connectivity.
Comparing to industry benchmarks, perhaps the base is standard, advanced is +15%, pro +30%.
Managers Note: Highlight certifications as a breakthrough, high brightness for well-lit areas, and modular design.
Also, use "With X, you can Y" structure.
I need to ensure all parts are covered. Let me structure this now.
</think>