VIMODE Pro Unicycle Direct Buy Ecorider Electric Scooter From China

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, so in the structured requirements, the user first mentions Technical Parameters Table with Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the format example, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. The user might have intended the Technical Specifications table to have those three columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit), but the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. Maybe it's a mistake, but since the format example shows Benefit, I'll follow that. Alternatively, perhaps the user wants two tables? Let me check again.

Looking at the user's instruction:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

Hmm, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is supposed to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the format example, the Technical Specifications table is given as Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications table to be the one with Feature, Specification, Benefit, and the Technical Parameters Table is another one. But since the format example shows Technical Specifications with three columns, I think the user might have mixed up the terms. To resolve this, perhaps the Technical Specifications table in the format is the one they want, so I'll proceed with that structure (Feature, Specification, Benefit).

Moving on, the Choose Your Model table needs three models compared to benchmarks. Since the product has different battery options, I can create three models based on battery capacity and voltage. For example:

Base Model: 60V 20Ah (lower capacity, shorter range) Advanced: 72V 45Ah (mid-range) Pro: 72V 50Ah (highest capacity, longest range)

Parameters could include Range, Top Speed, Load Capacity, Battery Life, Smart Features.

In the Managers Note, need to highlight three technical breakthroughs. The brushless motor, advanced battery tech (maybe higher capacity or efficiency), and smart features (Bluetooth, sensors). Then guide users based on their needs: unisex, so comfort and adjustability. Pro for heavy users, Advanced for balance between features and cost, Base for budget-conscious.

Also, ensure the "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With a 72V 50Ah battery, you can achieve a range of up to 80km on a single charge."

Comparative hints: "30% longer range than standard models" or similar.

Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the format. </think>