Supplier's note
...
Ah, so the user's example uses "Technical Specifications" with columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the structured requirements mention a Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. There's a conflict here. The user might have intended the example to be the correct format, so I should follow the example's structure for the Technical Specifications table, using Benefit instead of Application Scenario. The structured requirements might be part of the initial instruction but perhaps the example's format takes precedence. Since the user provided the example format, I'll follow that.
Therefore, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph or elsewhere.
Moving forward, let's structure the Technical Specifications table with the three columns as per the example.
Now, for the product details:
Product Title: Xinjintuo 3d Wheel Alignment Maintenance Equipment Tyre Tire Changer Fitting Changing Balancer Balancing Machine 4 Post Car Lift
Category: Car Lifts
Product Attributes: brand:xinjintuo, certification:CE, EPR_Germany_Packing, EPR_France_Packing, driving mode:hydraulic, style:four post, type:double cylinder hydraulic lift, four post car lift, hydraulic lift.
Vision details include a four-post lift up to 4000 kg, wheel alignment machine, balancing machine, etc. The product seems to be a comprehensive maintenance equipment including wheel alignment and balancing, along with the lift.
So the Technical Specifications should include features like Lifting Capacity, Driving Mode, Certifications, Structural Design, etc.
Let's list possible features:
- Lifting Capacity: 4000 kg (from vision detail)
- Driving Mode: Hydraulic
- Certifications: CE, EPR Germany, EPR France
- Structural Design: Four-post, Double Cylinder
- Platform Dimensions: Maybe from vision's "platform size" customization
- Precision: For wheel alignment and balancing
- Safety Features: Hydraulic system reliability, maybe emergency stop
Benefits for each:
- Lifting Capacity: Handles heavy vehicles up to 4000 kg, suitable for SUVs and trucks.
- Hydraulic Driving: Smooth and stable operation, easy to control.
- Certifications: Compliance with EU standards, ensuring safety and environmental responsibility.
- Four-post Design: Stable support for vehicles during maintenance.
- Double Cylinder: Enhanced lifting power and stability.
- Precision: Accurate alignment and balancing for optimal tire performance.
- Safety Features: Reduces risk of accidents during use.
Application scenarios would be in the Scenario Solution paragraph, perhaps.
Customization Guide: Adjustable lifting height (up to 1800mm) and customizable platform size (from 1800x600mm to 2200x800mm) to meet different vehicle needs.
Get Inspiration: Highlight the 3D wheel alignment, hydraulic efficiency, certifications, and durability.
Choose Your Model table: Three versions (Base, Advanced, Pro). Parameters could be Lifting Capacity, Precision Level, Automation Level, etc. Comparing against industry benchmarks.
Managers Note: First paragraph on technical breakthroughs like hydraulic efficiency, 3D alignment tech, EPR certifications. Second paragraph guiding users to choose based on their needs: Base for standard garages, Advanced for precision work, Pro for high-volume with automation.
Now, putting it all into markdown as per the example structure.
</think>