Round Honeycomb Ceramic Heat Storage Body Mullite, Cordierite Ceramic Carrier Honeycomb Ceramic for Fresh air System

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

So here, the Technical Specifications table has columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the user's structured requirement says Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). There's a conflict here. The user might have intended the Technical Parameters Table to be the Technical Specifications section, but with different columns. Since the user explicitly listed the columns as Feature, Specification, Application Scenario in the structured requirements, I should follow that for the Technical Specifications table, even if the example shows Benefit. Alternatively, perhaps the user made an error, but better to follow the explicit instruction.

Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is a separate table. Let me check the user's instruction again:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

Therefore, the Technical Parameters Table is a separate table with those three columns. The example format's Technical Specifications might be a different table. But the user's example format includes "Technical Specifications" with Benefit. To resolve this, perhaps the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be part of the Technical Specifications section. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables: one Technical Parameters Table with the three columns, and another in the example format. But since the user provided the example format, maybe they want the Technical Specifications table as per the example, but with the columns adjusted. This is a bit confusing. To proceed, I'll follow the explicit instruction for the Technical Parameters Table columns (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) as per the structured requirements, even if the example shows Benefit. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake, but better to follow the explicit instruction.

Wait, the user's instruction says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table is a required table with those columns. The example format's Technical Specifications section may be a different table, but perhaps the user wants both. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is the same as the Technical Specifications table. To avoid confusion, I'll create the Technical Parameters Table as per the columns specified, and include it under the Technical Specifications section, but with the columns as per the instruction.

Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications section to have the three columns (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). Let me proceed with that.

Now, moving to the product attributes. The material is alumina ceramic, mullite, cordierite. The certifications are IEC62321, EPR France and Germany. The shape is round, cylindrical. The application areas are refractory, wear resistance, heat storage. The vision details mention honeycomb structure for increased surface area, used in catalytic converters, heat exchangers, etc.

For the Technical Parameters Table:

Feature: Material Composition Specification: Alumina ceramic, Mullite, Cordierite ceramic Application Scenario: Industrial applications requiring high thermal stability and chemical resistance, such as catalytic converters and heat exchangers.

Feature: Honeycomb Structure Specification: Customizable porosity and cell density Application Scenario: Enhanced gas/fluid flow in filtration systems or heat exchangers.

Feature: Thermal Stability Specification: Withstands temperatures up to 1400°C Application Scenario: High-temperature environments like industrial furnaces.

Wait, but the product attributes mention application:refractory, wear resistance, heat storage. So maybe include those as features?

Alternatively, the features should be derived from the product attributes and vision details. Let's list possible features:

• Material: Alumina ceramic, mullite, cordierite
• Structure: Honeycomb with customizable porosity/cell density
• Thermal Stability: High temp resistance
• Chemical Resistance: From the material
• Certification: IEC62321, EPR standards
• Shape: Round cylindrical

Application scenarios would be things like catalytic converters, heat exchangers, filtration systems, etc.

So the Technical Parameters Table would have rows like:

That covers the main points. Now the Customization Guide should mention adjustable parameters like porosity, cell density, thickness, etc., to meet specific needs like flow rate control or filtration efficiency.

The Scenario Solution paragraph needs an example like "The medium porosity design is ideal for automotive exhaust systems where balanced flow and heat dissipation are critical."

The Choose Your Model table needs three versions. Let's define parameters like Thermal Resistance, Porosity, Chemical Resistance, and compare Base, Advanced, Pro.

Example:

Managers Note should highlight breakthroughs like ceramic materials, honeycomb customization, certifications. Then guide selection: Pro for high-temp, Advanced for moderate needs, Base for standard applications.

Need to ensure "With X, you can Y" sentences. For example, "With triple the industry-standard chemical resistance, you can safely handle corrosive chemicals in processing plants."

Also include comparative hints like "20% faster heat exchange than traditional models."

Putting it all together in the required format. </think>