Supplier's note
...
Wait, the user's instruction says the Technical Parameters Table should have Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, it's Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. The user might have made a mistake here. Since the structured requirements explicitly state the columns as Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, I should follow that. The example format might be an oversight. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. But the instruction says to convert Vision Detail's parameters (Material/size) and Product Attributes (certification etc.) into the table.
Alternatively, perhaps the user wants two tables: one for Technical Parameters with the three columns, and the example's Technical Specifications as another. But the format provided in the example includes Technical Specifications with Benefit. This is confusing. To resolve, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, and Application Scenario as per the structured requirements, even if the example shows Benefit. I'll proceed with that, as the structured requirements are explicit.
So, for the Technical Specifications table:
Feature | Specification | Application Scenario
Examples:
- Material | PET | Custom skins for PS4 consoles and mobile phones
- Cutting Precision | ±0.1mm | Ensures accurate cuts for intricate designs
- Cutting Speed | 100cm/min | Efficient production of large-scale skins
Application scenarios would explain where each feature is useful.
Customization Guide: Mention adjustable parameters like cutting depth, speed, blade pressure to accommodate different materials.
Scenario Solution: "The PET material's durability makes it ideal for PS4 console skins, resisting scratches and maintaining vibrant designs over time."
Choose Your Model table: Parameters like Cutting Speed, Material Thickness Capacity, Precision. Base model has standard specs, Advanced with 15% faster speed, Pro with 30% higher precision. Compare to industry benchmarks.
Managers Note: Highlight PET material as a breakthrough, adjustable parameters allowing customization, and versatility across devices. Guide users to choose Pro for precision needs, Advanced for speed, Base for basic use.
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the format. Also, ensure the "With X, you can Y" structure in the descriptions. For example, "With Daqin's PET material, you can create durable skins that resist scratches and fading."
Also, check if any comparative hints can be added, like "20% faster than traditional plotters" if applicable. Since the Advanced model is +15%, maybe the Pro is +30% faster than base, so perhaps "30% faster than industry standards" if that's reasonable.
Need to make sure all sections are covered and the structure matches the required format. Also, the product title mentions PS4, so focus on that in the application scenarios even though the attribute says mobile phone. Maybe the application is both, so include both in the scenarios.
</think>