- About product and suppliers:
Q: How do you fix the speed control?
A: yes , you are able . If you 're a deal , you are able control as much of it as you like !
Q: What was the length of the foot based on?
A: The historic origin of the foot , as a unit of measure , been under discussion in Wikipedia ( see extract below ) following address/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_ ( lengt ... Historical origin The foot as a measuring 's used in nearly all Western cultural and is usually split into twelve or occasionally 10 inches/thumbs , or into sixteen fingers/digits . The firstly known standards foot measuring 's from Sumer , where a definition is provided in a statue of Gudea of Lagash from all over 2575 BC . Some metrologists speculate that the imperial foot was readjusted from an Egyptian measuring by the Greeks , with a later larger foot be approved by the Romans . Some of the earliest records of the americaned of the foot originating from the regions across ancient Greece . The originators devised , or perhaps borrowed from Egypt , the extent of longitude , split the circumference of the Earth into 360 degrees , and subsplit the degree for shorter distances . One degree of longitude is split into 600 stadia . One stadion is split into 600 feet . Thus the extent of longitude measured 360,thousand feet . ( By modern-day reckoning , one degree of longitude is roughly 365,221 feet . ) One mile was 10 stadia or 6thousand feet . This is crucialally the same mile that was ( or still remains ) utilized in the Western hemisphere , but the modern-day foot 's a longer than the initial . The popular belief is that the initial standard was the duration of a man ’ s foot . This were more likely genuine , however , when local governments and national rulers began calibrating and identifying measures , the foot of no human person was presumably utilized as the base . In rural area and without calibrated rulers , numerous units of measurement was actually on the basis length of some part of body of the person measuring ( or for example the area that could be ploughed in a day ) . In that sense , the human foot was n't doubt the source of the measures unit called a `` foot '' and represents also for a long time the definitions contained in its length . To prevent dissension and allowed trade , numerous towns made a decision a standards length and demonstrateded this publically . In order to enableed concurrent used of the different units of length based on different places around the human body and other `` natural '' units of length , the different units were reidentified as multiples of one another , whereby their lengths no long corresponds to the initial `` natural '' standards . This procedures for national standardization beginning in Scotland in 1150 and in England in 1303 , but numerous various regional standards ha exists in these two countries longer before . Some think that the initial measures of the English foot 's from King Henry I , who ha a foot twelve inches longer ; he wants to standardize the unit of measurement in England . However this situation is improbable , since there are records of the term be utilised approximately seventy years prior to his birth . This certainly does not preclude the possibility that th's old standard was redefined ( `` calibrated '' ) accordance with the ruler 's foot . In fact , there exist proof that this kind of process was common before standardisation . A new , significant ruler could 're trying impose a new standard for 's existing unit ... ... but it 's imare likely to any king 's foot 's ever as longer as the modern-day unit of measure . The average foot length is about nine.4 inches ( 240 mm ) for current Europeans . Approximately 99.6 % of British mens have a foot that was lower than twelve inches longer . One was endeavouring to `` explain '' the `` missing '' inches is that the measuring did not be mentioned a nude foot , but to the duration of shoe , which could theoretically add an inch or 2 to the nude foot 's length . This be consistent with the measuring being convenient for pragmatic usages such as construction sites . People nearly always pace out lengths while wearing shoes or boots , instead of for the removal ofm and pacing barefoot . There 's nevertheless historical documentss of the definitions contained in the inch on the basis breadth ( not length ) of a man 's thumb that is extremely precise for the criteria of the time . One of these was the basis of an averaging calculated using three mens of different sized , thereby enabling astonishing precision and uniformity across a country even without calibrated rulers . It thus seemed likely that at the very least since about the Twelfth century , the particular length of a foot was indeed on the basis inch , not the other way round . Since this length are comparatively closes to the sized of most feet , at the very least in shoes , this allowed the aforementioned used of one 's shoes in approximating lengths without measurement devices . This sort of imprecise the steps that in addition overly multiplied the measures error due to reiterateed used of a short `` ruler '' ( the foot ) 's never utilized in surveying and in constructing most complex buildings .
Q: Im 12 years 11 months and im 5 foot 8 your mum is 5 foot 4 and your dad is 6 foot 1 Do you have a chance of being 6 foot 3 or 4?
A: Probably closer to 6'1 '' or 6'2 '' . But height predictors are solely averages you are able be taller than thwere only alcertainly taller than six foot .