Large Button Maker
About large button maker
Where to Find Large Button Maker Suppliers?
China remains the central hub for large button maker production, with key manufacturing clusters in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shanghai offering specialized capabilities in garment accessory machinery and finished button fabrication. Huizhou and Shanghai host vertically integrated facilities that combine tooling, stamping, molding, and assembly under one roof, enabling rapid turnaround for both equipment and consumables. These regions benefit from mature supply chains for base materials such as zinc alloy, plastic resins, and magnetic backings, reducing material lead times by 20–30% compared to offshore alternatives.
The industrial ecosystems support dual sourcing models: suppliers offering manual and semi-automatic button-making machines capable of producing 50–120 units per minute, and high-volume manufacturers producing pre-made large buttons in custom designs. Facilities typically operate on a monthly output capacity ranging from 500,000 to over 5 million units, depending on complexity and order specifications. Buyers gain access to scalable production networks where component sourcing, quality control, and packaging are managed within localized zones, ensuring lead times of 15–30 days for standard orders.
How to Choose Large Button Maker Suppliers?
Effective supplier selection requires structured evaluation across technical, operational, and transactional dimensions:
Product & Process Alignment
Confirm whether the supplier specializes in button-making machines or pre-fabricated large buttons. Machine-focused suppliers offer hydraulic or manual presses for diameters up to 63.5mm, often supporting square, round, and fridge magnet configurations. For finished buttons, verify compatibility with design requirements including size (commonly 50x50mm to 63.5x63.5mm), material (plastic, resin, metal), and backing type (pin, magnet, sew-on).
Quality Assurance Protocols
Prioritize suppliers with documented quality management practices. While formal ISO certification is not universally listed, consistent on-time delivery rates above 96% and reorder rates exceeding 25% indicate reliable process execution. Evaluate response time metrics—suppliers responding within ≤2 hours demonstrate operational responsiveness critical for issue resolution and customization coordination.
Customization and Minimum Order Quantities (MOQ)
Assess flexibility in design personalization, including logo imprinting, color matching, and shape variation. MOQs vary significantly:
- Finished buttons: As low as 100 pieces for premium finishes; typically 1,000–5,000 pieces for cost-effective runs
- Machines: Priced between $140–$850 per set, with MOQ of 1 unit for trial orders
- Custom tooling: May require additional setup fees for non-standard dies or molds
Cross-reference pricing tiers with order volume to identify optimal cost-per-unit thresholds.
What Are the Best Large Button Maker Suppliers?
| Company Name | Main Products | On-Time Delivery | Response Time | Reorder Rate | Online Revenue | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huizhou Yubo Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. | Buttons, Stoppers, Badges | 96% | ≤3h | 27% | US $30,000+ | - |
| Shanghai Kouyi Technology Development Co., Ltd. | Plastic Resin Buttons, Rhinestones | 100% | ≤2h | 16% | US $140,000+ | Custom Manufacturer |
| Hangzhou Yuming Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. | Sewing Buttons, Magnetic Closures | 96% | ≤4h | 26% | US $390,000+ | Multispecialty Supplier |
| In the trend inc | Button Machines, Badge Presses | Data Unavailable | ≤4h | Data Unavailable | Data Unavailable | - |
| CQ MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INC | Food Processing Equipment, Button Makers | Data Unavailable | ≤2h | Data Unavailable | Data Unavailable | - |
Performance Analysis
Huizhou Yubo and Hangzhou Yuming exhibit strong buyer retention, reflected in reorder rates of 27% and 26% respectively, suggesting consistent product quality and service reliability. Shanghai Kouyi stands out with a verified 100% on-time delivery rate and robust customization infrastructure, supported by capabilities in color, material, size, logo, and packaging design. Despite lower reorder metrics, its higher online revenue indicates significant transaction volume and market reach. Suppliers like CQ MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INC demonstrate fast response times but list unrelated primary products (e.g., waffle makers), raising concerns about core competency focus. Prioritize suppliers whose main product lines align directly with button manufacturing equipment or accessories to ensure domain expertise.
FAQs
How to verify large button maker supplier reliability?
Evaluate response consistency, on-time delivery history, and alignment between advertised and actual product offerings. Request sample batches to assess build quality, print clarity, and structural integrity. For machine suppliers, confirm technical documentation availability, including operation manuals and spare parts lists.
What is the typical lead time for large button maker orders?
Standard orders for finished buttons ship within 15–20 days after confirmation. Machine orders generally require 20–30 days, including testing and packaging. Rush processing may reduce timelines by 5–7 days, subject to supplier capacity.
Can suppliers provide customized large buttons or machines?
Yes, most suppliers support full customization including logo embedding, Pantone color matching, unique shapes, and special backings. Machine suppliers can modify die sizes for non-standard dimensions (e.g., 63.5mm) upon request. Custom tooling may incur one-time setup costs.
Do large button makers support small test orders?
Many suppliers accept trial orders starting at 100–500 pieces for buttons and single-unit purchases for machines. Low MOQ options facilitate design validation before scaling to bulk production.
What payment and transaction protections are available?
Buyers should utilize secure payment methods with escrow functionality to mitigate risk. Review supplier transaction histories for dispute frequency and resolution outcomes. Verified suppliers with consistent revenue reporting and responsive communication present lower procurement risk.









