When shopping for an affordable Android phone, two names often surface in budget-conscious buyers’ minds: the Samsung Galaxy A12 and the Galaxy A03s. Released just a year apart, these devices target similar audiences—first-time smartphone users, seniors, or those seeking a reliable backup device. But with overlapping price points and comparable designs, which one truly offers better value? More importantly, does the older A12 still outperform its newer sibling, the A03s, despite being released earlier?
The answer isn’t as straightforward as it seems. While newer doesn't always mean better, especially in Samsung’s budget lineup, certain upgrades in the A03s could sway your decision. Let’s break down the key differences in display, performance, camera, battery, and software to determine whether the Galaxy A12 still holds up—or if the A03s deserves the spotlight.
Display and Build Quality
Both phones feature 6.5-inch displays with HD+ resolution (720 x 1600), but they differ slightly in panel technology and usability. The Galaxy A12 uses a PLS LCD panel, known for decent brightness and color reproduction for its class. The A03s also uses an LCD screen, so there's no major leap in visual quality. However, the A12 has a slight edge in screen-to-body ratio due to a smaller notch housing its front camera.
In terms of build, both models use plastic bodies and feature rear-mounted fingerprint sensors. The A12 feels slightly more solid in hand thanks to a marginally sturdier frame design, though neither is built for heavy-duty use. The A03s opts for a simpler, more utilitarian look with a glossy back that attracts fingerprints easily—a minor annoyance but worth noting.
Performance and Hardware Comparison
This is where the debate heats up. The Galaxy A12 is powered by the MediaTek Helio G35, an octa-core chipset designed for light gaming and everyday tasks like browsing and messaging. It comes with options of 3GB or 4GB RAM and up to 128GB internal storage. In contrast, the A03s runs on the Unisoc SC9863A—a processor typically found in entry-level Chinese smartphones. While technically newer, this chip performs at roughly the same level as the older Snapdragon 429, lagging behind the Helio G35 in both CPU and GPU benchmarks.
Real-world usage reflects this gap. Apps open faster on the A12, multitasking is smoother, and overall system responsiveness feels snappier. The A03s can handle basic functions, but stuttering during app switches or video playback is not uncommon. If you plan to use social media apps, YouTube, or even casual games like Candy Crush, the A12 delivers a noticeably better experience.
“On paper, newer chips suggest progress—but in budget phones, brand reputation and real-world optimization matter more than release dates.” — David Lin, Mobile Analyst at TechPulse Asia
Battery Life: Where the A12 Shines
One area where the Galaxy A12 clearly outclasses the A03s is battery capacity. It packs a massive 5000mAh cell, identical to the A03s—but here’s the catch: the A12’s more efficient processor and optimized software allow it to last longer under typical use. Users report up to two full days of moderate use on the A12, while the A03s often requires daily charging, even with light screen time.
Neither supports fast charging; both come with 10W chargers. But because the A12 manages power more effectively, it spends less time plugged in despite having the same battery size. This efficiency makes it a better choice for travelers, students, or anyone who can’t access a charger frequently.
Camera Capabilities Compared
Both phones feature quad-camera setups on the rear, though only the primary sensor does any meaningful work. The Galaxy A12 includes a 48MP main camera, 5MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth sensor. The A03s steps down to a 13MP main shooter, paired with two 2MP auxiliary lenses (macro and depth). There’s no ultrawide lens on the A03s—a notable downgrade.
In daylight conditions, the A12 captures sharper images with better dynamic range. Its higher-resolution sensor allows for modest cropping without total loss of detail. Low-light performance is poor on both, as expected at this price point, but the A12 again edges ahead thanks to larger pixel sizes and better noise processing.
The front cameras are nearly identical—both 5MP units suitable for video calls and dimly lit selfies. Neither excels, but they get the job done.
- Main Camera:
- A12: 48MP | A03s: 13MP → Clear advantage to A12
- Ultrawide Lens:
- A12: Yes | A03s: No → Only A12 offers wider framing
- Low-Light Performance:
- A12: Moderate grain, usable shots | A03s: Blurry, over-smoothed → A12 wins again
Software and Long-Term Usability
The Galaxy A12 launched with Android 10 and received updates to Android 12 with One UI Core 4.1. The A03s debuted with Android 11 and is eligible for Android 12 and 13, theoretically offering longer support. However, update delivery for Samsung’s A-series varies widely by region, and many users never receive promised upgrades.
More importantly, the A03s runs a lighter version of One UI with fewer features and optimizations. While it may feel slightly faster initially due to lower bloat, long-term stability suffers because the underlying hardware struggles to keep pace. Meanwhile, the A12’s combination of better chipset and mature software tuning results in fewer crashes and smoother navigation over time.
Detailed Comparison Table
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A12 | Samsung Galaxy A03s |
|---|---|---|
| Release Year | 2020 | 2021 |
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G35 | Unisoc SC9863A |
| RAM Options | 3GB / 4GB | 3GB / 4GB |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 13MP |
| Ultrawide Lens | Yes | No |
| Battery | 5000mAh | 5000mAh |
| Charging Speed | 10W | 10W |
| Initial OS | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Max Supported OS | Android 12 | Android 13 (planned) |
| Display Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Rear-mounted | Rear-mounted |
Mini Case Study: Maria’s Upgrade Dilemma
Maria, a retired teacher from Cebu, wanted a simple phone for staying in touch with her grandchildren via WhatsApp and Facebook. She considered both the A12 and A03s after seeing them priced similarly at ₱6,490 in a local electronics store. After testing both in-store, she noticed the A12 opened messages faster and displayed photos more clearly. Though sales staff pushed the “newer” A03s, Maria chose the A12 based on performance. Six months later, she reports no slowdowns, excellent battery life, and satisfaction with photo quality during video calls. Her takeaway: “Newer doesn’t mean better. I wanted reliability—and I got it.”
FAQ Section
Is the Samsung A12 still worth buying in 2024?
Yes, especially if found at a discounted price. Its superior processor, better camera, and proven durability make it a strong contender even years after release.
Can the A03s handle streaming services like Netflix?
Yes, but with limitations. Both phones support HD streaming, but the A03s may buffer more often and exhibit minor lag during transitions due to weaker processing power.
Do both phones have headphone jacks and microSD slots?
Yes. Both include a 3.5mm headphone jack and support microSD cards up to 1TB, making them ideal for users who rely on wired audio or need extra storage.
Final Verdict: Should You Choose the Older Model?
The evidence suggests yes—the Galaxy A12 remains the smarter buy despite being the older device. It outperforms the A03s in nearly every tangible category: processing speed, camera quality, and real-world battery endurance. While the A03s benefits from slightly newer software and marginally improved update eligibility, these advantages don’t compensate for its weaker core performance.
If you’re purchasing new or secondhand today, prioritize the A12 unless you find the A03s at a significantly lower price. Even then, consider whether saving a few dollars is worth accepting slower response times and inferior photo output. For most users, the answer will be no.








浙公网安备
33010002000092号
浙B2-20120091-4
Comments
No comments yet. Why don't you start the discussion?