100ML Bottle Premium Refill Sublimation Ink Compatible for Epson 6 Color Inkjet Printer Printing Sublimation Ink

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, here the Technical Specifications table has three columns: Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the user's structured requirements above say Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). So there's a conflict between the two parts of the user's instruction. Which one takes precedence?

Looking at the user's instruction, the first part says "Structured Requirements" which includes the Technical Parameters Table with those three columns. The example format later might be a different section. The user might have intended that the Technical Specifications in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table, but the columns are conflicting. Since the user's instruction is more explicit in the structured requirements, I should follow that. So the Technical Specifications section should be called Technical Parameters Table with columns Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example, it's called Technical Specifications with Benefit. Hmm, this is a problem. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake and the example is correct. Let me think again.

Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables: the Technical Parameters Table as per the structured requirements, and the Technical Specifications as per the example. But that would be redundant. Alternatively, perhaps the example's Technical Specifications is the same as the Technical Parameters Table, but the columns are different. Since the user's instruction says "Structured Requirements" first, perhaps that's the main structure to follow. Alternatively, maybe the example's format is the correct one, and the structured requirements are part of that. Maybe I should follow the example's format but adjust the columns as per the instruction. Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be the Technical Specifications in the example, but with different columns. This is a bit ambiguous, but since the user's instruction says "Structured Requirements" first, I'll proceed with the columns as per the instruction.

Therefore, the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. The example's Technical Specifications with Benefit might be a different section, but the user's instruction might have a mistake. To resolve this, I'll proceed with the instruction's structured requirements, so the Technical Parameters Table has those three columns. However, the example shows the Technical Specifications with Benefit. Since the user might have intended the example's format, perhaps I should follow the example's table structure but ensure that the columns align with the instruction. Alternatively, perhaps the user's instruction's structured requirements are part of the Technical Specifications. Let me try to reconcile both.

Alternatively, perhaps the user's "Technical Parameters Table" is the same as the "Technical Specifications" in the example, but with different columns. Since the example's format is the required output, perhaps the user intended that the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The structured requirements might be additional. Maybe I need to include both. Wait, the user's instruction says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the user wants the Technical Parameters Table with those three columns. The example's Technical Specifications section may be part of that. Therefore, I'll proceed to create the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. The example's Technical Specifications might be an additional section, but perhaps the user wants that. Alternatively, maybe the example's Technical Specifications is the same as the Technical Parameters Table but with different columns. This is confusing. To resolve, perhaps the user made a mistake and the example's Technical Specifications is the correct structure, so I'll follow that. The user might have intended the example's format as the correct one, with the Technical Specifications having Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Since the example is the final format to follow, perhaps that's the priority. Let me check the user's exact instruction again.

The user says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the user's structured requirements specify the Technical Parameters Table's columns. The example's format shows a Technical Specifications table with Benefit. Therefore, there's a conflict. Since the user's instruction explicitly states the columns for the Technical Parameters Table, I should follow that. The example's Technical Specifications might be a different section, but perhaps the user intended that the Technical Specifications in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table, but with different columns. Since the user's instruction is explicit, I'll proceed with the columns as per the instruction. However, the example's format requires the Technical Specifications table with Benefit. To resolve this, perhaps the user made a mistake and the example's Technical Specifications is the correct one. Alternatively, maybe the user wants both tables. But that's unlikely. Since the user's instruction says "Structured Requirements" first, perhaps the example's format is just an example of the sections, and the columns should follow the instruction. Therefore, I'll create the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But the example's format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit. Hmm. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to have those three columns. Alternatively, perhaps the user's instruction's structured requirements are part of the Technical Specifications. Let me proceed with the example's format but adjust the columns as per the instruction. Alternatively, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, and Application Scenario. I'll proceed with that.

Moving forward, let's outline the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. Features would be like Compatibility, Ink Type, Volume, etc. Specifications are the details, and Application Scenarios are where they're used. For example:

Feature: Compatibility, Specification: 100% compatible with Epson 6-color inkjet printers, Application Scenario: Professional sublimation printing on textiles and ceramics.

Next, the Customization Guide should suggest adjustable parameters. Maybe the ink's viscosity can be adjusted for different materials, or the drying time can be modified for faster production.

The Scenario Solution paragraph needs to explain how the ink's properties suit different uses. For example, the water-based ink is ideal for eco-friendly projects on fabric, while the high color accuracy is good for commercial printing on mugs.

The Choose Your Model table requires three versions. Let's assume the Base, Advanced, Pro models. Key attributes could be Color Accuracy, Print Resolution, Chemical Resistance. Base has standard specs, Advanced improves by 15%, Pro by 30%. For example:

The Manager's Note needs two paragraphs. First, three technical breakthroughs: maybe the 3-year shelf life, the 6-color range, and the triple chemical resistance in Pro. Then, guide users: Base for home use, Advanced for small businesses needing more colors, Pro for commercial with high durability.

Use "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With the Pro Model's triple chemical resistance, you can ensure prints remain vibrant even in harsh environments."

Also, include comparative hints like "20% faster drying time than traditional inks."

Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the example format, ensuring all sections are covered. Need to make sure the product details section is a few sentences summarizing the product, then the tables and sections as specified. </think>