Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so in the structured requirements, the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. The user might have intended that the Technical Specifications table in the final output should follow the example format with Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Since the example format is more specific, perhaps I should follow that. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake. To resolve, perhaps the Technical Specifications table in the output should follow the example's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit), and the Technical Parameters Table mentioned in the structured requirements is part of the thought process but not the final output. Wait, the user says "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text: Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements: Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)". So the user wants the Technical Specifications table in the output to have those three columns. But the example format shows Benefit instead. Hmm, this is conflicting. Since the user's instruction says "Structured Requirements" first, perhaps prioritize that. So the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But the example shows Benefit. Maybe the user wants both? Or perhaps the example is a different part. Let me check the exact instruction again.

The user's instruction says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table is part of the structured requirements and should have those columns. The example format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit, but perhaps the user intended that the Technical Specifications section is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Maybe there's a mix-up in terminology. To avoid confusion, perhaps the Technical Specifications table in the output should follow the structured requirements' columns (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). However, the example format shows Benefit. Since the user provided an example format, maybe they want the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake in the example. Since the user's instruction says "Structured Requirements" first, I'll proceed with the columns as per the structured requirements. Wait, but the example format given by the user for the Technical Specifications has Benefit. Maybe the user intended that the Technical Specifications table in the output should have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. To resolve this, perhaps I should follow the example format's structure since it's more specific. The example shows:

Technical Specifications

Therefore, I'll use Feature, Specification, Benefit for the Technical Specifications table.

Now, moving forward. Let's outline each section step by step.

Product Details: A brief intro. Mention the product's unique features, materials, and the shoe stand's functionality.

Technical Specifications Table: Features like Material (Shoe: Metallic Fabric, Stand: Transparent PC), Heel Design (Triangular Pyramid), Decorative Elements (Pearl/Rhinestone Buckle), Application (Shoes, Slippers, Sandals), Stand Stability (Triangular Base). Specifications would be the specific details, and Benefits would explain the advantages.

Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like heel height, material thickness, or decorative elements. For example, adjusting heel height to meet comfort needs, or material thickness for durability.

Get Inspiration: Highlight the combination of style and functionality, the materials, and how they cater to different occasions.

Choose Your Model Table: Three versions. Key attributes could be Material Durability, Heel Stability, Decorative Complexity. Base Model has standard PC and basic design, Advanced with enhanced durability and more details, Pro with premium materials and customizable features. Use percentages or comparative terms.

Managers Note: First paragraph on technical breakthroughs: triangular heel for stability, transparent PC stand for durability, decorative elements for aesthetics. Second paragraph guiding users: Pro for heavy use, Advanced for moderate, Base for basic needs. Use the "With X, you can Y" structure and comparative hints where possible.

Need to ensure all product attributes are included. The application is shoes, slippers, sandals, so the Technical Specifications should note that. The style is high heels, so that's covered in the features.

Check for any missing info. The product attributes mention application but not specific certifications. Since the user mentioned certification standards in the product attributes, but none are provided, perhaps omit that or note as N/A. Alternatively, assume standard certifications like ISO if applicable, but since not given, maybe leave it out.

Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the example format. </think>