TRUSTED AUSTRALIAN BEEF EXPORTERS WITH PREMIUM GRASS-FED FROZEN BEEF

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, in the FORMAT section, the Technical Specifications table has columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the Structured Requirements, it's Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. So there's a conflict here. The user probably intended the example format to be followed, so I should use the columns as per the example (Feature, Specification, Benefit). Because the example is part of the required format. The Structured Requirements might have been a mistake, or perhaps the user intended that the Technical Parameters Table is the same as the Technical Specifications table. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is a different table, but the user's example doesn't mention it. This is confusing.

Alternatively, perhaps the user's "Structured Requirements" are additional instructions beyond the format. The key is to follow the FORMAT section's example. Since the example shows the Technical Specifications table with Benefit, I'll proceed with that. The user might have made a mistake in the structured requirements, but the example is more concrete.

Proceeding with that assumption.

Now, the Technical Specifications table should include features like Marbling Quality, Fat Content, Organic Certification, Storage, Packaging, etc., with their specifications and benefits.

Next, the Customization Guide: suggest adjustable parameters like cut type, marbling level, portion size, and packaging options to meet specific needs.

The Get Inspiration section should highlight the product's strengths, like marbling, organic, low fat, etc., and how they benefit the user.

The Choose Your Model table needs three models (Base, Advanced, Pro) with parameters like Marbling Level, Fat Content, Certification, etc. For example:

Alternatively, since the product is already organic, perhaps the Base includes organic, but Pro adds more. Need to think.

Managers Note: First paragraph highlights three breakthroughs, like organic certification, high marbling, low fat. Second paragraph guides users to choose based on their needs. For example, Pro for premium restaurants needing top marbling, Advanced for home chefs wanting organic and good marbling, Base for budget but still organic.

Also, ensure the "With X, you can Y" structure is used in the descriptions. Like "With premium marbling, you can achieve melt-in-your-mouth tenderness when grilled."

Comparative hints where applicable, like "30% higher marbling than industry standards."

Alright, putting it all together now. </think>