Two Component Closed Cell Polyurethane Insulation Espuma De Poliuretano PU Spray Foam

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so the user's format example uses Technical Specifications with Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the format example, perhaps they want the Technical Specifications table to follow the example's structure (Benefit), and the Technical Parameters Table is part of that. Maybe the user made a mistake in the structured requirements. To proceed, I'll follow the example's format for Technical Specifications, using Benefit, and ensure that application scenarios are mentioned in the benefit or in the Scenario Solution paragraph.

Now, proceeding with the Technical Specifications table:

Features from product attributes:

• Material: Polyurethane (closed-cell)
• Certification: EPR Germany Packing
• Type: Double component adhesives, spray foam, binder
• Application: Leather, fiber & garment, construction, insulation
• Feature: Insulation (thermal resistance, moisture barrier)

Specifications would be the details of each feature. For example:

Feature: Material Composition | Specification: Two-component polyurethane foam | Benefit: Provides high thermal resistance and moisture barrier.

Application Scenario would be in the benefit column, like "Ideal for construction insulation and industrial sealing".

Next, the Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like curing time, viscosity, or component ratios to suit specific applications (e.g., faster curing for garment production).

Get Inspiration: Highlight versatility across industries, safety, and ease of use.

Choose Your Model table: Parameters like Insulation Efficiency, Chemical Resistance, Application Versatility. Base model has standard specs, Advanced +15%, Pro +30%. Chemical resistance could go from basic to triple industry standard. Application versatility expands from construction to include more industries.

Managers Note: Three breakthroughs could be closed-cell structure, EPR compliance, and dual-component system. Then guide users to choose Pro for harsh environments needing high resistance, Advanced for medium needs, Base for standard use.

Need to ensure all sections are covered and use the required sentence structures. Also, include comparative hints where possible, like "20% faster curing than traditional adhesives" if applicable. Since the product is a spray foam, maybe the Advanced model has faster curing time compared to Base.

Wait, the product attributes mention "spray", so perhaps the spray application allows faster curing. Maybe the Advanced model has a 20% faster curing time than traditional adhesives. That could be a comparative hint.

Double-checking all inputs and ensuring no details are missed. The certification is EPR Germany, important for environmental compliance. Applications include insulation, construction, leather, and garments. The vision details mention drums with plastic wrapping, but since the product is spray foam, maybe the drums are for storage and transport of the components. The customization solutions from the vision include color coding and labeling, so in the Customization Guide, mention adjustable parameters like component ratios or color coding for different applications.

Putting it all together now in the required markdown format. </think>