Under Counter Sonic Ice Maker
CN
About under counter sonic ice maker
Where to Find Under Counter Sonic Ice Maker Suppliers?
China remains the central hub for under counter sonic ice maker manufacturing, with key production clusters in Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces. These regions host vertically integrated supply chains that support rapid prototyping and high-volume output. Ningbo and Yuyao in Zhejiang are particularly notable for compact refrigeration systems, offering access to precision sheet metal fabrication, compressor assembly lines, and automated testing stations within a 30km radius.
The industrial ecosystem enables efficient coordination between component suppliers—such as condenser units, evaporators, and control panels—and final assembly facilities. This proximity reduces lead times by up to 25% compared to offshore alternatives. Buyers benefit from scalable production models: standard models can be delivered in batches of 100–1,800 units monthly per supplier, with material sourcing dominated by food-grade stainless steel, ABS plastic, and R600a refrigerant. Air-cooled systems represent over 90% of current production due to lower maintenance requirements and simpler installation profiles.
How to Choose Under Counter Sonic Ice Maker Suppliers?
Procurement decisions should be guided by three core evaluation criteria:
Quality Assurance & Compliance
Confirm adherence to international safety and performance standards. While not all suppliers hold formal ISO 9001 certification, consistent on-time delivery rates (≥97%) and documented response times (≤2 hours) serve as operational proxies for reliability. CE marking is frequently observed across product listings, indicating design compliance with European electrical and EMC directives. For North American markets, verify compatibility with voltage standards (110–120V) and evaluate compressor durability under continuous operation cycles.
Production Capacity Verification
Assess scalability through available data points:
- Monthly output capacity ranging from 100 to 1,800 units based on listed product variants
- Evidence of in-house engineering capabilities, including circuit design, thermal management, and user interface integration
- Customization options confirmed across multiple suppliers, covering dimensions, plug types, branding (logo/label), color finishes, and packaging configurations
Cross-reference online revenue indicators (e.g., US $50,000+ annual platform sales) with reorder rates; suppliers maintaining reorder rates below 15% suggest stable customer satisfaction.
Transaction Risk Mitigation
Utilize secure payment structures such as escrow or milestone-based releases tied to production milestones. Prioritize suppliers with response times under two hours and 100% on-time delivery records to minimize communication delays. Request product samples to validate ice yield accuracy (typically rated between 12–105 lbs/24h), noise levels, and self-cleaning functionality before bulk ordering.
What Are the Best Under Counter Sonic Ice Maker Suppliers?
| Company Name | Main Products (Listings) | Online Revenue | On-Time Delivery | Avg. Response | Reorder Rate | Customization Offered | Sample MOQ | Price Range (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu Eternity Import & Export Co., Ltd. | Ice Machines (895) | US $50,000+ | 100% | ≤2h | <15% | Yes | N/A | N/A |
| Yuyao Haohong Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. | Ice Makers (123) | US $170,000+ | 100% | ≤2h | <15% | Limited | 1 pc | $66.90–130 |
| Ningbo Yingyi International Trade Co., Ltd. | Ice Makers (N/A) | US $210,000+ | 100% | ≤2h | 27% | Yes | 10 pcs | $110–365 |
| Ningbo Lory Electrical Appliances Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Ice Makers (42) | US $5,000+ | 85% | ≤1h | 16% | No | 100 pcs | $37–65 |
| Shenzhen Aurotech Technology Co., Ltd. | Ice Makers (77) | US $130,000+ | 100% | ≤2h | <15% | Limited | 1 pc | $36.50–118 |
Performance Analysis
Jiangsu Eternity leads in specialization with over 895 ice machine listings, indicating deep domain expertise and broad model coverage. Ningbo Yingyi commands the highest reported revenue (US $210,000+) and offers full customization despite a higher reorder rate (27%), suggesting strong post-purchase engagement. Yuyao Haohong and Shenzhen Aurotech provide competitive entry-level pricing with low sample MOQs, ideal for market testing. Ningbo Lory, while responsive (≤1h), has an on-time delivery rate of 85%, which may pose fulfillment risks for time-sensitive contracts. All top-tier suppliers maintain 100% on-time delivery, underscoring reliability in order execution.
FAQs
What certifications should under counter sonic ice makers comply with?
CE marking is commonly provided for electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety. For U.S. and Canadian markets, ensure equipment meets UL/CSA standards—though direct certification may require third-party testing. RoHS compliance should be confirmed for electronic components to meet environmental regulations in Europe and Asia.
What is the typical lead time for bulk orders?
Standard production cycles range from 25 to 35 days after order confirmation, depending on customization level and order volume. Shipping via sea freight adds 15–30 days for trans-Pacific delivery. Air freight reduces transit time to 5–10 days but increases logistics costs significantly.
Can suppliers customize ice maker specifications?
Yes, leading suppliers offer modifications in size, cooling method, power plug type, control panel layout, and branding elements such as logos and labels. Custom designs typically require minimum order quantities of 100–500 units and may extend lead times by 7–14 days for tooling adjustments.
What are common MOQs for under counter sonic ice makers?
MOQs vary widely: sample orders start at 1 piece for some suppliers, while mass production batches begin at 100 pieces. Higher-end commercial models often require MOQs of 10–50 units due to specialized components and assembly processes.
How to evaluate compressor quality in sourced units?
Request technical documentation on compressor type (e.g., rotary vs. reciprocating), expected lifespan (measured in operating hours), and noise rating (dB). Benchmark against industry norms: reliable compressors operate for 30,000–50,000 hours with sound levels below 45 dB. Field testing under sustained load is recommended to assess thermal stability and defrost cycle efficiency.









